Arithmetic from Kant to Frege: Numbers, Pure Units, and the Limits of Conceptual Representation: Daniel Sutherland


Authors
Daniel Sutherland
University of Illinois, Chicago
Abstract
There is evidence in Kant of the idea that concepts of particular numbers, such as the number 5, are derived from the representation of units, and in particular pure units, that is, units that are qualitatively indistinguishable. Frege, in contrast, rejects any attempt to derive concepts of number from the representation of units. In the Foundations of Arithmetic, he softens up his reader for his groundbreaking and unintuitive analysis of number by attacking alternative views, and he devotes the majority of this attack to the units view, with particular attention to pure units. Since Frege, the units view has been all but abandoned. Nevertheless, the idea that concepts of number are derived from the representation of units has a long history, beginning with the ancient Greeks, and was prevalent among Frege's contemporaries. I am not interested in resurrecting the units view or in righting wrongs in Frege's criticisms of his contemporaries. Rather, I am interested in the program of deriving concepts of number from pure units and its history from Kant to Frege. An examination of that history helps us understand the units view in a way that Frege's criticisms do not, and in the process uncovers important features of both Kant's and Frege's views. I will argue that, although they had deep differences, Kant and Frege share assumptions about what such a view would require and about the limits of conceptual representation. I will also argue that they would have rejected the accounts given by some of Frege's contemporaries for the same reasons. Despite these agreements, however, there is evidence that Kant thinks that space and time play a role in overcoming the limitations of conceptual representation, while Frege argues that they do not.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S1358246108000088
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 39,566
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Euclid Strikes Back at Frege.Joongol Kim - 2014 - Philosophical Quarterly 64 (254):20-38.
Frege, Kant, and the Logic in Logicism.John MacFarlane - 2002 - Philosophical Review 111 (1):25-65.
Frege, Kant e le Vorstellungen.Gabriele Tomasi & Alberto Vanzo - 2006 - Rivista di Storia Della Filosofia 61 (supplement):227-238.
On Frege's Logical Diagrams.Iulian D. Toader - 2004 - In Diagrammatic Representation and Inference. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 2980,. pp. 22-25.
Frege on Cardinality.Lila Luce - 1988 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 48 (3):415-434.
Identity, Individuality, and Unity.E. J. Lowe - 2003 - Philosophy 78 (3):321-336.
Frege on Conceptual and Propositional Analysis.Mark Textor - 2010 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 81 (1):235-257.
Kant and Frege on Existence and the Ontological Argument.Michael E. Cuffaro - 2012 - History of Philosophy Quarterly 29 (4):337-354.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2017-02-21

Total views
9 ( #696,358 of 2,325,877 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #927,055 of 2,325,877 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature