Journal of Social Philosophy 48 (4):499-506 (2017)

Authors
Peter A. Sutton
Virginia Union University
Abstract
The comparative utility argument holds that the descendants of African slaves in America are not owed any compensation because they have not been harmed by slavery. Rather, slavery in America was beneficial to the descendants of slaves because they are now able to live in a country that is considerably richer today than any of the African countries from which slaves were taken. In this paper, I show that the comparative utility argument is a red herring with no bearing whatsoever on the question of slave reparations because it conflates two separate wrongs: slavery and forced immigration. The fact that the descendants of slaves now live in America is a consequence of the latter, but not the former. As such, it has no bearing on the legitimacy reparations for slavery.
Keywords slavery  reparations  justice  colonialism  Booker T. Washington  injustice  comparative utility  the non-identity problem
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/josp.12213
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

A Lockean Argument for Black Reparations.Bernard R. Boxill - 2003 - The Journal of Ethics 7 (1):63-91.
Transgenerational Compensation.George Sher - 2005 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 33 (2):181-200.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Case Against Reparations.Stephen Kershnar - 2001 - Philosophy in the Contemporary World 8 (1):41-46.
Sartre, Fanon, and the Case for Slavery Reparations.Chris Buck - 2004 - Sartre Studies International 10 (2):123-138.
Sartre, Fanon, and the Case for Slavery Reparations.Chris Buck - 2004 - Sartre Studies International 10:123-138.
Reparations: Interdisciplinary Inquiries.Jon Miller & Rahul Kumar (eds.) - 2007 - Oxford University Press.
Principles for Measuring the Damages of American Slavery.George Schedlerf - 2002 - Public Affairs Quarterly, 16 (4):377-404.
Reparations and Racial Inequality.Derrick Darby - 2010 - Philosophy Compass 5 (1):55-66.
Reparations and the Rectification of Race.Naomi Zack - 2003 - The Journal of Ethics 7 (1):139 - 151.
Reparations After Identity Politics.Lawrie Balfour - 2005 - Political Theory 33 (6):786-811.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2017-07-19

Total views
194 ( #53,016 of 2,444,934 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
13 ( #53,063 of 2,444,934 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes