Better Foundations for Subjective Probability

Australasian Journal of Philosophy 103 (1):1-22 (2024)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

How do we ascribe subjective probability? In decision theory, this question is often addressed by representation theorems, going back to Ramsey (1926), which tell us how to define or measure subjective probability by observable preferences. However, standard representation theorems make strong rationality assumptions, in particular expected utility maximization. How do we ascribe subjective probability to agents which do not satisfy these strong rationality assumptions? I present a representation theorem with weak rationality assumptions which can be used to define or measure subjective probability for partly irrational agents.

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

Non-Ideal Decision Theory.Sven Neth - 2023 - Dissertation, University of California, Berkeley
Risk and Tradeoffs.Lara Buchak - 2014 - Erkenntnis 79 (S6):1091-1117.
Measuring Belief and Risk Attitude.Sven Neth - 2019 - Electronic Proceedings in Theoretical Computer Science 297:354–364.
Interpretations of Probability.Weimin Sun - 2003 - Dissertation, The University of Connecticut

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-12-15

Downloads
823 (#33,772)

6 months
264 (#12,004)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Sven Neth
University of Pittsburgh

Citations of this work

Probability and Inductive Logic.Antony Eagle - 2025 - Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Non-Ideal Decision Theory.Sven Neth - 2023 - Dissertation, University of California, Berkeley

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Foundations of Statistics.Leonard Savage - 1954 - Wiley Publications in Statistics.
The Logic of Decision.Richard C. Jeffrey - 1965 - New York, NY, USA: University of Chicago Press.
Risk and Rationality.Lara Buchak - 2013 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.

View all 51 references / Add more references