AbstractThis is a presentation of the utilitarian approach to punishment. It is meant for students. A note added in July, 2022 advises the reader about the author's current views on some topics in the paper. The first section discusses Bentham's psychological hedonism. The second briefly criticizes it. The third section explains abstractly how utilitarianism would determine of the right amount of punishment. The fourth section applies the theory to some cases, and brings out how utilitarianism could favor punishments more or less severe than the lex talionis.
Similar books and articles
Kant’s Theory of Criminal Law and the Jus Talionis.Dieter Hüning - 2013 - Estudos Kantianos 1:139-160.
A Non-Utilitarian Approach to Punishment.H. J. McCloskey - 1965 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 8 (1-4):249 – 263.
A Utilitarian Reply to Dr. McCloskey.T. L. S. Sprigge - 1965 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 8 (1-4):264 – 291.
Utilitarianism, Responsibility, and Punishment: With Special Reference to R. B. Brandt's Defence of Utilitarianism.Ingrid Petersson - 1976 - Tryckbaren.
''Deterrent Punishment and Respect for Persons''.Zachary Hoskins - 2011 - Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law 8 (2):369-384.
Punishment as Deterrence: Reply to Sprague.Anthony Ellis - 2005 - Philosophical Quarterly 55 (218):98 - 101.
On Interpreting Mill's Utilitarianism.Maurice Mandelbaum - 1968 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 6 (1):35-46.
On Wrongs, Rights, and Responsibilities: A Utilitarian Theory of Punishment.Steven Alan Soderholm - 1996 - Dissertation, University of Minnesota
Cesare Beccaria's Influence on English Discussions of Punishment, 1764–1789.Anthony J. Draper - 2000 - History of European Ideas 26 (3-4):177-199.
Punishment and Discretion in Mill's Utilitarianism.Piers Norris Turner - 2015 - Utilitas 27 (2):165-178.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads