The Journal of Ethics 5 (4):293-313 (2001)

Authors
Steven Sverdlik
Southern Methodist University
Abstract
Contemporary Kantians who defend Kant''s view of the superiority of the sense of duty as a form of motivation appeal to various ideas. Some say, if only implicitly, that the sense of duty is always ``available'''' to an agent, when she has a moral obligation. Some, like Barbara Herman, say that the sense of duty provides a ``nonaccidental'''' connection between an agent''s motivation and the act''s rightness. In this paper I show that the ``availability'''' and ``nonaccidentalness'''' arguments are in tension with one another. And the ``availability'''' idea, although certainly supported by some passages in Kant himself, is also clearly denied in other passages. My conclusion is that Kantians will need to abandon either availability or nonaccidentalness if they wish to have a consistent set of views about the sense of duty.
Keywords acting from duty  duty  Herman  Kant  moral motivation  moral worth  obligation  sense of duty
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2004
DOI 10.1023/A:1013989220282
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 54,676
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Kant on Moral Agency and Women's Nature.Mari Mikkola - 2011 - Kantian Review 16 (1):89-111.
One Desire Too Many.Nathan Robert Howard - forthcoming - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research.
Kant-Bibliographie 2001.Margit Ruffing - 2003 - Kant-Studien 94 (4):474-528.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
71 ( #136,537 of 2,386,128 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #203,690 of 2,386,128 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes