Ratio Juris 24 (2):194-246 (2011)
According to the received opinion there is a theoretical incompatibility between Herbert Hart's The Concept of Law and Alf Ross's On Law and Justice, and, according to the received opinion, it stems above all from Hart's emphasis on the internal point of view. The present paper argues that this reading is mistaken. The Concept of Law does not go beyond On Law and Justice in so far as both present arguments to the effect that law is based on a shared understanding between participants in a project perceived by every participant to be a project in common. The paper demonstrates that there are substantive parallels between Hart's combination of “acceptance” or “acknowledgement” and a “critical reflective attitude” and Ross's combination of “motivation” or “feeling” and a “coherent whole of meaning and motivation.” The main conclusion is that the views of norms and normativity put forward in The Concept of Law and On Law and Justice are very close in essential respects, and, more specifically, that the two works are at root identical in their representation of the basis of normativity in reality.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Critique of Pure Reason.Immanuel Kant - 1991 - In Elizabeth Schmidt Radcliffe, Richard McCarty, Fritz Allhoff & Anand Vaidya (eds.), Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. Blackwell. pp. 449-451.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Hart on Legality, Justice and Morality.John Gardner - 2010 - Jurisprudence: An International Journal of Legal and Political Thought 1 (2):253-265.
Hart's Postscript: Essays on the Postscript to the Concept of Law.Jules L. Coleman (ed.) - 2000 - Oxford University Press.
In Defense of Hart.Matthew H. Kramer - 2013 - In Wil Waluchow & Stefan Sciaraffa (eds.), Philosophical Foundations of the Nature of Law. Oxford University Press. pp. 22.
The Legacy of H.L.A. Hart: Legal, Political, and Moral Philosophy.Matthew H. Kramer (ed.) - 2008 - Oxford University Press.
Jeremy Bentham and HLA Hart's ‘Utilitarian Tradition in Jurisprudence’.Philip Schofield - 2010 - Jurisprudence: An International Journal of Legal and Political Thought 1 (2):147-167.
Positivism And The Inseparability Of Law And Morals.Leslie Green - 2008 - New York University Law Review 83:1035--1058.
Was Austin Right After All? On the Role of Sanctions in a Theory of Law.Frederick Schauer - 2010 - Ratio Juris 23 (1):1-21.
Hart and Raz on the Non-Instrumental Moral Value of the Rule of Law: A Reconsideration. [REVIEW]Mark J. Bennett - 2011 - Law and Philosophy 30 (5):603-635.
Added to index2011-05-12
Total downloads16 ( #301,285 of 2,177,988 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #317,698 of 2,177,988 )
How can I increase my downloads?