Is Climate Change Morally Good from Non-Anthropocentric Perspectives?

Ethics, Policy and Environment 21 (2):215-228 (2018)
Authors
Abstract
Anthropogenic climate change poses some difficult ethical quandaries for non-anthropocentrists. While it is hard to deny that climate change is a substantial moral ill, many types of non-human organisms stand to benefit from climate change. Modelling studies provide evidence that net primary productivity (NPP) could be substantially boosted, both regionally and globally, as a result of warming from increased concentrations of greenhouse gases. The same holds for deployment of certain types of climate engineering, or large-scale, technological modifications of the global environment in order to prevent or slow anthropogenic climate change. For example, solar radiation management with stratospheric aerosol injections could benefit plant life by promoting enhanced photosynthesis, increasing diffuse radiation, and reducing heat stress. This has a surprising implication: from some non-anthropocentric perspectives, certain scenarios of climate change and climate engineering might bring about morally better states of affairs when compared to emission-mitigation baselines.
Keywords climate change  non-anthropocentrism  geoengineering
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1080/21550085.2018.1509486
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Reasons and Persons.Derek Parfit - 1984 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 47 (2):311-327.
Are Values in Nature Subjective or Objective? Rolston - 1982 - Environmental Ethics 4 (2):125-151.
Epistemology and Environmental Values.Bryan G. Norton - 1992 - The Monist 75 (2):208-226.
The Move From Is to Good in Environmental Ethics.John Nolt - 2009 - Environmental Ethics 31 (2):135-154.
Are Values in Nature Subjective or Objective?Iii Holmes Rolston - 1982 - Environmental Ethics 4 (2):125-151.

View all 7 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Anthropocentric Advantage? Environmental Ethics and Climate Change Policy.Nicole Hassoun - 2011 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 14 (2):235-257.
Are We Morally Obligated to Assist Climate Change Migrants?Katrina M. Wyman - 2013 - Law and Ethics of Human Rights 7 (2):185-212.
Individual Responsibility for Climate Change.Melany Banks - 2013 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 51 (1):42-66.
On the Concept of Climate Debt: Its Moral and Political Value.Jonathan Pickering & Christian Barry - 2012 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 15 (5):667-685.
Aerosol Geoengineering Deployment and Fairness.Toby Svoboda - 2016 - Environmental Values 25 (1):51-68.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2018-09-13

Total views
31 ( #219,529 of 2,313,319 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
28 ( #17,121 of 2,313,319 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature