Law, liberty, and Christian morality

Religious Studies 43 (4):395-415 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX


There is a long liberal political tradition of marshalling arguments aimed at convincing Christians that distinctively Christian reasons for issuing coercive laws are not sufficient to justify those laws. In the first part of this paper I argue that the two most popular of these arguments, attributable to Locke, will not reliably convince committed biblical Christians, nor, probably, should they. In the second part I argue that even if the Lockean arguments fail, committed biblical Christians should think that God has authorized the state only to fill the same general role that political liberals have identified for it.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Legal Toleration for Belief and Behaviour.Kyle Swan - 2010 - History of Political Thought 31 (1):87-106.
Three Concepts of Political Liberty.Kyle Swan - 2003 - Journal of Markets and Morality 6 (1):117-142.
There may be strict empirical laws in biology, after all.Mehmet Elgin - 2006 - Biology and Philosophy 21 (1):119-134.
Orthodoxy and Heresy.Eleonore Stump - 1999 - Faith and Philosophy 16 (2):147-163.
The Singularity of Christian Ethics.Gilbert Meilaender - 1989 - Journal of Religious Ethics 17 (2):95-120.


Added to PP

28 (#536,385)

6 months
5 (#526,961)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Kyle Swan
California State University, Sacramento

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references