Why the Ultra-Darwinists and the Creationists Both Get It Wrong by Conor Cunningham


Authors
Brendan Sweetman
Rockhurst University
Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
DOI 10.5840/ncbq201515359
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 46,223
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The End of Death?Conor Cunningham - 2005 - Yearbook of the Irish Philosophical Society:19-42.
Dawkins is Dead: Long Live Evolution!Conor Cunningham - 2015 - New Blackfriars 96 (1063):269-278.
Nihilism and Theology: Who Stands at the Door?Conor Cunningham - 2013 - In Nicholas Adams, George Pattison & Graham Ward (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Theology and Modern European Thought. Oxford University Press. pp. 325.
Probability and Evolution. Why the Probability Argument of Creationists is Wrong.Josef Schurz - 2007 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 38 (1):163-165.
Locating the Wrongness in Ultra-Violent Video Games.David I. Waddington - 2007 - Ethics and Information Technology 9 (2):121-128.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2016-06-30

Total views
17 ( #532,097 of 2,285,756 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #250,848 of 2,285,756 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature