Designing a Good Life: A Matrix for the Technological Mediation of Morality [Book Review]

Science and Engineering Ethics 18 (1):157-172 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Technologies fulfill a social role in the sense that they influence the moral actions of people, often in unintended and unforeseen ways. Scientists and engineers are already accepting much responsibility for the technological, economical and environmental aspects of their work. This article asks them to take an extra step, and now also consider the social role of their products. The aim is to enable engineers to take a prospective responsibility for the future social roles of their technologies by providing them with a matrix that helps to explore in advance how emerging technologies might plausibly affect the reasons behind people’s (moral) actions. On the horizontal axis of the matrix, we distinguished the three basic types of reasons that play a role in practical judgment: what is the case, what can be done and what should be done. On the vertical axis we distinguished the morally relevant classes of issues: stakeholders, consequences and the good life. To illustrate how this matrix may work in practice, the final section applies the matrix to the case of the Google PowerMeter.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 86,377

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library


Added to PP

132 (#117,784)

6 months
1 (#866,649)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

T. E. Swierstra
Maastricht University

Citations of this work

Computing and moral responsibility.Merel Noorman - forthcoming - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Computing and moral responsibility.Kari Gwen Coleman - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

View all 14 citations / Add more citations