Design defended: Swinburne Defending design

Think 2 (6):13-18 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Richard Swinburne responds to criticisms of his arguments from design for the existence of God.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,616

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

13 The Argument from Design'RG Swinburne.Rg Swinburne - 1999 - In Eleonore Stump & Michael J. Murray (eds.), Philosophy of Religion: The Big Questions. Blackwell. pp. 6--100.
Design Arguments: A Re-Evaluation.David Nathan Kessler - 1983 - Dissertation, University of Notre Dame
What Swinburne should have concluded.Charles E. Gutenson - 1997 - Religious Studies 33 (3):243-247.
Debating Design: From Darwin to Dna.Richard Swinburne - 2004 - Cambridge University Press.
The argument from design.R. G. Swinburne - 1968 - Philosophy 43 (165):199 - 212.
Two Peas in a Single Polytheistic Pod: Richard Swinburne and John Hick.Daniel Howard-Snyder - 2016 - Journal of Philosophical Research 41 (Supplement):17-32.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-04-12

Downloads
122 (#137,032)

6 months
8 (#158,054)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references