European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 2 (1):1 - 24 (2010)
Inanimate explanation is to be analysed in terms of substances having powers and liabilities to exercise their powers under certain conditions; while personal explanation is to be analysed in terms of persons, their beliefs, powers, and purposes. A crucial criterion for an explanation being probably true is that it is (among explanations leading us to expect the data) the simplest one. Simplicity is a matter of few substances, few kinds of substances, few properties (including powers and liabilities), few kinds of properties, and mathematically simple relations between properties. Explanation of the existence of the universe by the agency of God provides the simplest kind of personal explanation there can be, and one simpler than any inanimate explanation. I defend this view more thoroughly than previously in light of recent challenges.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Is Goodness Without God Good Enough?Robert K. Garcia & Nathan L. King (eds.) - 2009 - Rowman & Littlefield.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
A Natural Explanation of the Existence and Laws of Our Universe.Quentin Smith - 1990 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 68 (1):22 – 43.
Swinburne's Explanation of the Universe. [REVIEW]Quentin Smith - 1998 - Religious Studies 34 (1):91-102.
The Argument From Laws of Nature Reassessed.Richard Swinburne - 2004 - In M. Ruse & W. Dembski (eds.), Debating Design: From Darwin to Dna. Cambridge University Press.
Relations Between Universals,or Divine Laws?Richard Swinburne - 2006 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 84 (2):179 – 189.
Second Reply to Grünbaum.Richard Swinburne - 2005 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 56 (4):919-925.
Fine-Tuning and Probability: Does the Universe Require Explanation?Stephen Coleman - 2001 - Sophia 40 (1):7 - 15.
How the Divine Properties Fit Together: Reply to Gwiazda.Richard Swinburne - 2009 - Religious Studies 45 (4):495-498.
Prior Probabilities in the Argument From Fine-Tuning.Richard Swinburne - 2005 - Faith and Philosophy 22 (5):641 - 653.
Added to index2011-04-12
Total downloads110 ( #42,482 of 2,146,969 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #162,483 of 2,146,969 )
How can I increase my downloads?
There are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.