God As the Simplest Explanation of the Universe

Abstract
Inanimate explanation is to be analysed in terms of substances having powers and liabilities to exercise their powers under certain conditions; while personal explanation is to be analysed in terms of persons, their beliefs, powers, and purposes. A crucial criterion for an explanation being probably true is that it is (among explanations leading us to expect the data) the simplest one. Simplicity is a matter of few substances, few kinds of substances, few properties (including powers and liabilities), few kinds of properties, and mathematically simple relations between properties. Explanation of the existence of the universe by the agency of God provides the simplest kind of personal explanation there can be, and one simpler than any inanimate explanation. I defend this view more thoroughly than previously in light of recent challenges.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S1358246111000142
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 25,767
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
What is a Law of Nature?D. M. Armstrong - 1983 - Cambridge University Press.
Laws of Nature.Fred I. Dretske - 1977 - Philosophy of Science 44 (2):248-268.
The Nature of Laws.Michael Tooley - 1977 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 7 (4):667-98.

View all 7 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
The Limits of Explanation.Richard Swinburne - 1990 - Philosophy 27 (Supplement):177 - 193.
Arguments From Design.Richard Swinburne - 2002 - Think 1 (1):49 - 54.
A Natural Explanation of the Existence and Laws of Our Universe.Quentin Smith - 1990 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 68 (1):22 – 43.
Swinburne's Explanation of the Universe. [REVIEW]Quentin Smith - 1998 - Religious Studies 34 (1):91-102.
The Argument From Laws of Nature Reassessed.Richard Swinburne - 2004 - In M. Ruse & W. Dembski (eds.), Debating Design: From Darwin to Dna. Cambridge University Press.
Relations Between Universals,or Divine Laws?Richard Swinburne - 2006 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 84 (2):179 – 189.
Second Reply to Grünbaum.Richard Swinburne - 2005 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 56 (4):919-925.
Prior Probabilities in the Argument From Fine-Tuning.Richard Swinburne - 2005 - Faith and Philosophy 22 (5):641 - 653.
Viability Explanation.Arno Wouters - 1995 - Biology and Philosophy 10 (4):435-457.

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2011-04-12

Total downloads

110 ( #42,482 of 2,146,969 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

5 ( #162,483 of 2,146,969 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums