Religious Studies 45 (4):495-498 (2009)
Jeremy Gwiazda has criticized my claim that God, understood as an omnipotent, omniscient, and perfectly free person is a person ’of the simplest possible kind’ on the grounds that omnipotence, etc., as spelled out by me are omnipotence, etc., of restricted kinds, and so less simple forms of these properties than maximal forms would be. However, the account which I gave of these properties in ’The Christian God’ (although not in ’The Coherence of Theism’) shows that, when they are defined in certain ways, they all follow from one property of ’pure, limitless, intentional power’. I argue here that a person who has these properties so defined is a person ’of the simplest possible kind’
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Similar books and articles
On the Divine Nature and the Nature of Divine Freedom.Thomas B. Talbott - 1988 - Faith and Philosophy 5 (1):3-24.
On the Coherence of the Incarnation: The Divine Preconscious Model.Andrew Loke - 2009 - Neue Zeitschrift für Systematicsche Theologie Und Religionsphilosophie 51 (1):50-63.
God As the Simplest Explanation of the Universe.Richard Swinburne - 2010 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 2 (1):1 - 24.
Divine Omnipotence and Divine Omniscience: A Reply to Michael Martin.Noreen E. Johnson - 2007 - Sophia 46 (1):69-73.
Realization, Micro-Realization, and Coincidence.Sydney Shoemaker - 2003 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 67 (1):1-23.
Added to index2009-10-25
Total downloads63 ( #83,678 of 2,172,038 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #117,383 of 2,172,038 )
How can I increase my downloads?