Journal of Symbolic Logic 64 (3):1125-1154 (1999)

In [60] N. Belnap presented an 8-element matrix for the relevant logic R with the following property: if in an implication A → B the formulas A and B do not have a common variable then there exists a valuation v such that v(A → B) does not belong to the set of designated elements of this matrix. A 6-element matrix of this kind can be found in: R. Routley, R.K. Meyer, V. Plumwood and R.T. Brady [82]. Below we prove that the logics generated by these two matrices are the only maximal extensions of the relevant logic R which have the relevance property: if A → B is provable in such a logic then A and B have a common propositional variable
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.2307/2586622
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 58,777
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Note on Algebraic Models for Relevance Logic.Josep M. Font & Gonzalo Rodríguez - 1990 - Zeitschrift fur mathematische Logik und Grundlagen der Mathematik 36 (6):535-540.
RI the Bounds of Finitude.Robert K. Meyer - 1970 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 16 (7):385-387.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
34 ( #307,534 of 2,425,451 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #547,144 of 2,425,451 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes