Journal of Medical Ethics 30 (1):73-79 (2004)

Abstract
Background: Financial conflict of interest in clinical research is an area of active debate. While data exist on the perspectives and roles of academic institutions, investigators, industry sponsors, and scientific journals, little is known about the perspectives of potential research participants.Methods: The authors surveyed potential research participants over the internet, using the Harris Interactive Chronic Illness Database. A potential research participant was defined by: self report of diagnosis by a health care professional and willingness to participate in clinical trials. Email invitations were sent to 20 205 persons with coronary artery disease, breast cancer, or depression; a total of 6363 persons were screened; of these, 86% or 5478 met inclusion criteria and completed the survey. The outcome measures were respondents’ ratings on: importance of knowing conflict of interest information, whether its disclosure ought to be required, and its effect on willingness to participate—across seven widely discussed scenarios of financial conflicts of interest .Results: Majority responded that knowing conflict of interest information was “extremely” or “very” important; a larger majority felt financial conflicts of interest should be disclosed as part of informed consent . In all seven scenarios, a majority was still willing to participate but in some scenarios a sizable minority would be wary of participation. Respondents were more wary of individual than institutional conflicts of interest. Illness group and sociodemographic factors had modest effects and did not affect the main trends.Conclusions: The prevailing practice of non-disclosure of financial conflicts of interest in clinical research appears contrary to the values of potential research participants
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1136/jme.2002.001461
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 65,645
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Community Equipoise and the Architecture of Clinical Research.Jason H. T. Karlawish & John Lantos - 1997 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 6 (4):385-.
Community Equipoise and the Architecture of Clinical Research.Jason H. T. Karlawish & John Lantos - 1997 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 6 (4):385-396.
Conflict of Interest: A Response to Michael Davis.John R. Boatright - 1993 - Business and Professional Ethics Journal 12 (4):43-46.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Troublesome Semantics of Conflict of Interest.Paul J. Friedman - 1992 - Ethics and Behavior 2 (4):245 – 251.
The Impact of Conflict of Interest on Trust in Science.Paul J. Friedman - 2002 - Science and Engineering Ethics 8 (3):413-420.
Managing Financial Conflicts of Interest in Clinical Research.Jordan J. Cohen - 2002 - Science and Engineering Ethics 8 (3):401-406.
Conflicts of Interest in Germany: A Legal Perspective.Christina Lux - 2002 - Science and Engineering Ethics 8 (3):327-336.
Conflicts of Interest in Science.David B. Resnik - 1998 - Perspectives on Science 6 (4):381-408.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2010-08-24

Total views
101 ( #109,913 of 2,462,257 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #449,178 of 2,462,257 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes