Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy (2008)
In 1935, Einstein, Podolsky, and Rosen (EPR) published an important paper in which they claimed that the whole formalism of quantum mechanics together with what they called a “Reality Criterion” imply that quantum mechanics cannot be complete. That is, there must exist some elements of reality that are not described by quantum mechanics. They concluded that there must be a more complete description of physical reality involving some hidden variables that can characterize the state of affairs in the world in more detail than the quantum mechanical state. This conclusion leads to paradoxical results. As Bell proved in 1964, under some further but quite plausible assumptions, this conclusion that there are hidden variables implies that, in some spin-correlation experiments, the measured quantum mechanical probabilities should satisfy particular inequalities (Bell-type inequalities). The paradox consists in the fact that quantum probabilities do not satisfy these inequalities. And this paradoxical fact has been confirmed by several laboratory experiments since the 1970s. Some researchers have interpreted this result as showing that quantum mechanics is telling us nature is non-local, that is, that particles can affect each other across great distances in a time too brief for the effect to have been due to ordinary causal interaction. Others object to this interpretation, and the problem is still open and hotly debated among both physicists and philosophers. It has motivated a wide range of research from the most fundamental quantum mechanical experiments through foundations of probability theory to the theory of stochastic causality as well as the metaphysics of free will.
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Causation, Measurement Relevance and No-Conspiracy in EPR.Iñaki San Pedro - 2012 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 2 (1):137-156.
Fine's Ways to Fail to Secure Local Realism.Soazig Le Bihan - 2009 - Studies in the History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 40 (2):142-150.
Can the Causal Paradoxes of Qm Be Explained in the Framework of Qed?György Darvas - 2009 - Foundations of Science 14 (4):273-280.
Fine Ways to Fail to Secure Local Realism.Soazig Le Bihan - 2009 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 40 (2):142-150.
Similar books and articles
Many Worlds Model Resolving the Einstein Podolsky Rosen Paradox Via a Direct Realism to Modal Realism Transition That Preserves Einstein Locality.Sascha Vongehr - manuscript
Bell's Inequalities, Relativistic Quantum Field Theory and the Problem of Hidden Variables.Miklos Redei - 1991 - Philosophy of Science 58 (4):628-638.
Contextual Hidden Variables Theories and Bell's Inequalities.Abner Shimony - 1984 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 35 (1):25-45.
Separable Hidden Variables Theory to Explain Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Paradox.S. V. Bhave - 1986 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 37 (4):467-475.
Relativity, Quantum Mechanics and EPR.Robert Clifton, Constantine Pagonis & Itamar Pitowsky - 1992 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1992:114 - 128.
The Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Argument in Quantum Theory.Arthur Fine - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads106 ( #45,392 of 2,152,226 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #281,219 of 2,152,226 )
How can I increase my downloads?
There are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.