Philosophical Studies 148 (2):253 - 272 (2010)
I identify a notion of compositionality at the intersection of the different notions philosophers, linguists, and psychologists are concerned with. The notion is compositionality of expression content: the idea that the content of a complex expression in a context of its utterance is determined by its syntactic structure and the contents of its constituents in the contexts of their respective utterances. Traditional arguments from productivity and systematicity cannot establish that the contents of linguistic expressions are compositionally determined in this sense. I present a novel argument for this thesis.
|Keywords||Compositionality Content Context Meaning Speech-act|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Mimesis as Make-Believe: On the Foundations of the Representational Arts.Kendall L. Walton - 1990 - Harvard University Press.
Presumptive Meanings: The Theory of Generalized Conversational Implicature.Stephen C. Levinson - 2000 - MIT Press.
Demonstratives.David Kaplan - 1989 - In Joseph Almog, John Perry & Howard Wettstein (eds.), Themes From Kaplan. Oxford University Press. pp. 481-563.
Citations of this work BETA
Similar books and articles
Communication and Strong Compositionality.Peter Pagin - 2003 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 32 (3):287-322.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads167 ( #25,544 of 2,132,837 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #198,410 of 2,132,837 )
How can I increase my downloads?
There are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.