Global justice, sovereignty, and the problem of perspective

Journal of International Political Theory 17 (1):99-116 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX


This article argues that a state-centered theory of global justice exhibits an epistemic problem of perspective, and that this worry exhibits a gendered character. Within a liberal domestic theory of justice, the public/private distinction has been repeatedly shown to be bad for women because it creates a domain for injustice that becomes invisible to public policy and the law. This article argues that state-centered theories of global justice create an analogous space that is cut off from questions of global justice. The article therefore suggests that this way of framing questions of global justice is problematic, and is problematic for women in particular. Just as the public/private distinction in liberal domestic justice leaves cases of injustice outside the vision of the law, the hard distinction between the domestic (state) sphere and the international realm of justice leaves cases of injustice invisible to international law. For the question of global justice, the privileging of sovereignty and non-intervention compromises the ability of the theory to achieve its purported goal of universal justice.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 79,898

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Liberal nationalism and cosmopolitan justice.Kok-Chor Tan - 2002 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 5 (4):431-461.
Our Problem of Global Justice.Shmuel Nili - 2011 - Social Theory and Practice 37 (4):629-653.
What is global about global justice? Toward a global philosophy.Thom Brooks - 2014 - In New waves in global justice. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. pp. 228-244.
Introduction: Global Justice and Bioethics.J. Millum - 2012 - In J. Millum & E. J. Emanuel (eds.), Global Justice and Bioethics. Oxford University Press. pp. 1-14.
Cosmopolitanism, Sovereignty and Global Justice.Regina Queiroz, Gabriele De Angelis & Diogo P. Aurélio - 2010 - In Regina Queiroz, Gabriele De Angelis & Diogo P. Aurélio (eds.), Sovereign Justice: Global Justice in a World of Nations. De Gruyter. pp. 161-176.
Can There Be Global Justice?Allan Layug - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 50:407-417.
Three Models of Global Community.Omar Dahbour - 2005 - The Journal of Ethics 9 (1-2):201-224.
Disaggregating Global Justice.Helena de Bres - 2013 - Social Theory and Practice 39 (3):422-448.
Global Health Justice and Governance.Jennifer Prah Ruger - 2012 - American Journal of Bioethics 12 (12):35-54.
Global Justice: A Cosmopolitan Account.Gillian Brock - 2009 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press. Edited by Catriona McKinnon.
Why global justice matters.Kok-Chor Tan - 2014 - Journal of Global Ethics 10 (2):128-134.


Added to PP

10 (#910,591)

6 months
1 (#479,521)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jennifer Szende
Ryerson University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Problem of Global Justice.Thomas Nagel - 2005 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 33 (2):113-147.
The Sexual Contract.Carole Pateman - 1990 - Ethics 100 (3):658-669.
Book Review: Thomas Pogge, World Poverty and Human Rights. [REVIEW]Thomas Pogge - 2003 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 6 (4):455-458.
On global justice.Mathias Risse - 2012 - Princeton: Princeton University Press.

View all 24 references / Add more references