Global justice, sovereignty, and the problem of perspective

Journal of International Political Theory 17 (1):99-116 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX


This article argues that a state-centered theory of global justice exhibits an epistemic problem of perspective, and that this worry exhibits a gendered character. Within a liberal domestic theory of justice, the public/private distinction has been repeatedly shown to be bad for women because it creates a domain for injustice that becomes invisible to public policy and the law. This article argues that state-centered theories of global justice create an analogous space that is cut off from questions of global justice. The article therefore suggests that this way of framing questions of global justice is problematic, and is problematic for women in particular. Just as the public/private distinction in liberal domestic justice leaves cases of injustice outside the vision of the law, the hard distinction between the domestic sphere and the international realm of justice leaves cases of injustice invisible to international law. For the question of global justice, the privileging of sovereignty and non-intervention compromises the ability of the theory to achieve its purported goal of universal justice.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Global justice, sovereignty, and the problem of perspective.Jennifer Szende - 2021 - Journal of International Political Theory 17 (1):99-116.
Liberal nationalism and cosmopolitan justice.Kok-Chor Tan - 2002 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 5 (4):431-461.
Our Problem of Global Justice.Shmuel Nili - 2011 - Social Theory and Practice 37 (4):629-653.
What is global about global justice? Toward a global philosophy.Thom Brooks - 2014 - In New waves in global justice. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. pp. 228-244.
The Interdependence of Domestic and Global Justice.Valentin Beck - 2019 - Yearbook for Eastern and Western Philosophy 2019 (4):75-90.
Introduction: Global Justice and Bioethics.J. Millum - 2012 - In J. Millum & E. J. Emanuel (eds.), Global Justice and Bioethics. Oxford University Press. pp. 1-14.
Cosmopolitanism, Sovereignty and Global Justice.Regina Queiroz, Gabriele De Angelis & Diogo P. Aurélio - 2010 - In Regina Queiroz, Gabriele De Angelis & Diogo P. Aurélio (eds.), Sovereign Justice: Global Justice in a World of Nations. De Gruyter. pp. 161-176.
Can There Be Global Justice?Allan Layug - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 50:407-417.
Three Models of Global Community.Omar Dahbour - 2005 - The Journal of Ethics 9 (1-2):201-224.
Disaggregating Global Justice.Helena de Bres - 2013 - Social Theory and Practice 39 (3):422-448.


Added to PP

17 (#846,424)

6 months
3 (#992,474)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jennifer Szende
Toronto Metropolitan University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations