Why Human Enhancement is Necessary for Successful Human Deep-space Missions
The New Bioethics 25 (4):295-317 (2019)
Abstract
While humans have made enormous progress in the exploration and exploitation of Earth, exploration of outer space remains beyond current human capabilities. The principal challenges lie in current space technology and engineering which includes the protection of astronauts from the hazards of working and living in the space environment. These challenges may lead to a paradoxical situation where progress in space technology and the ability to ensure acceptable risk/benefit for human space exploration becomes dissociated and the rate of scientific discovery declines. In this paper, we discuss the predominant challenges of the space environment for human health and argue that development and deployment of a human enhancement policy, initially confined to astronauts – for the purpose of future human space programmes is a rational solution to these challenges.My notes
Similar books and articles
Ethical Challenges in Human Space Missions: A Space Refuge, Scientific Value, and Human Gene Editing for Space.Konrad Szocik, Ziba Norman & Michael J. Reiss - 2020 - Science and Engineering Ethics 26 (3):1209-1227.
Multi-Level Challenges in a Long-Term Human Space Program. The Case of Manned Mission to Mars.Bartłomiej Tkacz & Konrad Szocik - 2018 - Studia Humana 7 (2):24-30.
Is human enhancement possible if it comes from the outside?Rubén Herce - 2019 - Scientia et Fides 7 (2):165-170.
Playing with the “Playing God”.Hossein Dabbagh & E. Andreeva - 2017 - In V. Menuz, J. Roduit, D. Roiz, A. Erler & N. Stepanovan (eds.), Future-Human. Life. Geneva, Switzerland: neohumanitas. org. pp. 72-78.
Responsible Research and Innovation and the Governance of Human Enhancement.Guido Gorgoni - 2018 - NanoEthics 12 (3):257-267.
Human Enhancement and Communication: On Meaning and Shared Understanding.Laura Cabrera & John Weckert - 2013 - Science and Engineering Ethics 19 (3):1039-1056.
Ideas of Perfection and the Ethics of Human Enhancement.Johann A. R. Roduit, Jan-Christoph Heilinger & Holger Baumann - 2015 - Bioethics 29 (9):622-630.
A Thomistic appraisal of human enhancement technologies.Jason T. Eberl - 2014 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 35 (4):289-310.
Moral Enhancement and the Human Condition.Edward Skidelsky - 2018 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 83:109-120.
Creatures Bound for Glory: Biotechnological Enhancement and Visions of Human Flourishing.Michael Burdett & Victoria Lorrimar - 2019 - Studies in Christian Ethics 32 (2):241-253.
Analytics
Added to PP
2019-09-28
Downloads
18 (#614,044)
6 months
1 (#447,139)
2019-09-28
Downloads
18 (#614,044)
6 months
1 (#447,139)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Transcending human frailties with technological enhancements and replacements: Transhumanist perspective in nursing and healthcare.Rozzano C. Locsin, Joseph Andrew Pepito, Phanida Juntasopeepun & Rose E. Constantino - 2021 - Nursing Inquiry 28 (2).
Should the colonisation of space be based on reproduction? Critical considerations on the choice of having a child in space.Maurizio Balistreri & Steven Umbrello - 2022 - Journal of Responsible Technology 11:100040.
References found in this work
Autonomy and Enhancement.G. Owen Schaefer, Guy Kahane & Julian Savulescu - 2013 - Neuroethics 7 (2):123-136.
An ethical pathway for gene editing.Julian Savulescu & Peter Singer - 2019 - Bioethics 33 (2):221-222.
Great Minds Think Different: Preserving Cognitive Diversity in an Age of Gene Editing.Jonny Anomaly, Julian Savulescu & Christopher Gyngell - 2020 - Bioethics 34 (1):81-89.
Untangling the debate: The ethics of human enhancement. [REVIEW]Patrick Lin & Fritz Allhoff - 2008 - NanoEthics 2 (3):251-264.
Enhancing the Species: Genetic Engineering Technologies and Human Persistence.Chris Gyngell - 2012 - Philosophy and Technology 25 (4):495-512.