A note on the deductive strength of the Nielsen‐Schreier theorem

Mathematical Logic Quarterly 64 (3):173-177 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We show that the Boolean Prime Ideal Theorem () does not imply the Nielsen‐Schreier Theorem () in, thus strengthening the result of Kleppmann from “Nielsen‐Schreier and the Axiom of Choice” that the (strictly weaker than ) Ordering Principle () does not imply in. We also show that is false in Mostowski's Linearly Ordered Model of. The above two results also settle the corresponding open problems from Howard and Rubin's “Consequences of the Axiom of Choice”.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 94,439

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-08-08

Downloads
19 (#808,196)

6 months
3 (#1,251,533)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Subgroups of a free group and the axiom of choice.Paul E. Howard - 1985 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 50 (2):458-467.
Nielsen‐Schreier and the Axiom of Choice.Philipp Kleppmann - 2015 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 61 (6):458-465.
Adding dependent choice.David Pincus - 1977 - Annals of Mathematical Logic 11 (1):105.

Add more references