Philosophy and Technology 31 (3):323-329 (2018)

Authors
Abstract
Deterrence in cyberspace is possible. But it requires an effort to develop a new domain-specific, conceptual, normative, and strategic framework. To be successful, cyber deterrence needs to shift from threatening to prevailing. I argue that by itself, deterrence is insufficient to ensure stability of cyberspace. An international regime of norms regulating state behaviour in cyberspace is necessary to complement cyber deterrence strategies and foster stability. Enforcing this regime requires an authority able to ensure States compliance with the norms at an international level, run investigations into suspected State-run cyber operations to define attribution, expose breaches of the norms, and impose adequate sanctions and punishments. These requirements define a political mandate for an authority that will have a deep impact on international relations and geo-political equilibriums. The UN Security Council has the necessary resources and the political and coercive power to meet these requirements. The time has come to embrace this power to consolidate and enforce an international regime of norms to regulate state behaviour in cyberspace. Problems, mistakes, and even failures are to be expected, but they must not hinder the process.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s13347-018-0328-0
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 62,513
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Limits of Deterrence Theory in Cyberspace.Mariarosaria Taddeo - 2018 - Philosophy and Technology 31 (3):339-355.
Just Information Warfare.Mariarosaria Taddeo - 2016 - Topoi 35 (1):213-224.

View all 13 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Limits of Deterrence Theory in Cyberspace.Mariarosaria Taddeo - 2018 - Philosophy and Technology 31 (3):339-355.
Deterrence in Cyberspace: A Silver Bullet or a Sacred Cow?Ewan Lawson - 2018 - Philosophy and Technology 31 (3):431-436.
Five Kinds of Cyber Deterrence.N. Ryan - 2018 - Philosophy and Technology 31 (3):331-338.
Norms in a Wired World.Steven A. Hetcher - 2004 - Cambridge University Press.
On Cyberspace and Being: Identity, Self, and Hyperreality.Lucas D. Introna - 1997 - Philosophy in the Contemporary World 4 (1/2):16-25.
Can Cyberspace Be Just?James Moor - 1999 - Etica E Politica 1 (2).
The Logic of Deterrence.Frank C. Zagare - 1987 - Analyse & Kritik 9 (1-2):47-61.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2018-08-10

Total views
19 ( #558,800 of 2,446,484 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #456,659 of 2,446,484 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes