To recycle or not to recycle? An intergenerational approach to nuclear fuel cycles

Science and Engineering Ethics 14 (2):177-200 (2008)
This paper approaches the choice between the open and closed nuclear fuel cycles as a matter of intergenerational justice, by revealing the value conflicts in the production of nuclear energy. The closed fuel cycle improve sustainability in terms of the supply certainty of uranium and involves less long-term radiological risks and proliferation concerns. However, it compromises short-term public health and safety and security, due to the separation of plutonium. The trade-offs in nuclear energy are reducible to a chief trade-off between the present and the future. To what extent should we take care of our produced nuclear waste and to what extent should we accept additional risks to the present generation, in order to diminish the exposure of future generation to those risks? The advocates of the open fuel cycle should explain why they are willing to transfer all the risks for a very long period of time (200,000 years) to future generations. In addition, supporters of the closed fuel cycle should underpin their acceptance of additional risks to the present generation and make the actual reduction of risk to the future plausible.
Keywords Intergenerational justice  Nuclear waste management  Reprocessing  Recycling  Future generations  Value conflicts  Sustainability
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11948-007-9049-y
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 24,392
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Axel Gosseries (2001). What Do We Owe the Next Generation(S)? Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review 35 (1):293-354.

View all 14 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Ibo van de Poel (2011). Nuclear Energy as a Social Experiment. Ethics, Policy and Environment 14 (3):285 - 290.

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

22 ( #213,802 of 1,924,687 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

2 ( #308,192 of 1,924,687 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.