On the Modal Content of A Posteriori Necessities

Theoria 75 (4):344-357 (2009)
Abstract
This paper challenges the Kripkean interpretation of a posteriori necessities. It will be demonstrated, by an analysis of classic examples, that the modal content of supposed a posteriori necessities is more complicated than the Kripkean line suggests. We will see that further research is needed concerning the a priori principles underlying all a posteriori necessities. In the course of this analysis it will emerge that the modal content of a posteriori necessities can be best described in terms of a Finean conception of modality – by giving essences priority over modality. The upshot of this is that we might be able to establish the necessity of certain supposed a posteriori necessities by a priori means.
Keywords necessary  a posteriori  essences  Kripke  a priori  modality  Soames  empirical  water  natural kinds
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1755-2567.2009.01048.x
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Naming and Necessity.Saul A. Kripke - 1980 - Harvard University Press.
Naming and Necessity.Saul Kripke - 2010 - In Darragh Byrne & Max Kölbel (eds.), Philosophy. Routledge. pp. 431-433.
Reference and Essence.Nathan U. Salmon - 1981 - Prometheus Books.

View all 12 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Soames's Deflationism About Modality.Tuomas E. Tahko - 2013 - Erkenntnis 78 (6):1367-1379.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2009-05-20

Total downloads

385 ( #6,760 of 2,171,802 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

30 ( #9,903 of 2,171,802 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums