In Michal Peliš (ed.), The Logica Yearbook 2007. Filosofia (2008)
The purpose of this paper is to examine the status of logic from a metaphysical point of view – what is logic grounded in and what is its relationship with metaphysics. There are three general lines that we can take. 1) Logic and metaphysics are not continuous, neither discipline has no bearing on the other one. This seems to be a rather popular approach, at least implicitly, as philosophers often skip the question altogether and go about their business, be it logic or metaphysics. However, it is not a particularly plausible view and it is very hard to maintain consistently, as we will see. 2) Logic is prior to metaphysics and has metaphysical implications. The extreme example of this kind of approach is the Dummettian one, according to which metaphysical questions are reducible to the question of which logic to adopt. 3) Metaphysics is prior to logic, and your logic should be compatible with your metaphysics. This approach suggests an answer to the question of what logic is grounded in, namely, metaphysics. Here I will defend the third option.
|Keywords||status of logic metalogic foundations of logic basis of logic logic and metaphysics law of non-contradiction|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Psychologism in the Logic of John Stuart Mill: Mill on the Subject Matter and Foundations of Ratiocinative Logic.David Godden - 2005 - History and Philosophy of Logic 26 (2):115-143.
Lectures on Metaphysics and Logic.William Hamilton - 1969 - Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt, Frommann-Holzboog.
Logical Pluralism is Compatible with Monism About Metaphysical Modality.Nicola Ciprotti & Luca Moretti - 2009 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 87 (2):275-284.
Added to index2009-02-01
Total downloads307 ( #9,895 of 2,172,036 )
Recent downloads (6 months)14 ( #22,569 of 2,172,036 )
How can I increase my downloads?