Philosophia Mathematica 9 (1):21-36 (2001)
This paper contains a defense against anti-realism in mathematics in the light both of incompleteness and of the fact that mathematics is a ‘cultural artifact.’. Anti-realism (here) is the view that theorems, say, of aritltmetic cannot be taken at face value to express true propositions about the system of numbers but must be reconstrued to be about somctliiiig else or about nothing at all. A ‘bite-the-bullet’ aspect of the defease is that, adopting new axioms, liitherto independent, is not. a matter of recognizing trutlis wliich had previoasly been unrecognized, but of extending the domain of what is true.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
A Burgessian Critique of Nominalistic Tendencies in Contemporary Mathematics and its Historiography.Karin Katz & Mikhail Katz - 2012 - Foundations of Science 17 (1):51-89.
Malament–Hogarth Machines and Tait's Axiomatic Conception of Mathematics.Sharon Berry - 2014 - Erkenntnis 79 (4):893-907.
Similar books and articles
Axioms for Intuitionistic Mathematics Incompatible with Classical Logic.A. S. Troelstra - 1975 - Mathematisch Instituut.
Philosophy of Mathematics: Prospects for the 1990s.Penelope Maddy - 1991 - Synthese 88 (2):155 - 164.
Independence and Justification in Mathematics.Krzysztof Wójtowicz - 2006 - Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 91 (1):349-373.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads53 ( #97,516 of 2,158,685 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #64,757 of 2,158,685 )
How can I increase my downloads?