David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Foundations of a General Theory of Manifolds [Cantor, 1883], which I will refer to as the Grundlagen, is Cantor’s first work on the general theory of sets. It was a separate printing, with a preface and some footnotes added, of the fifth in a series of six papers under the title of “On infinite linear point manifolds”. I want to briefly describe some of the achievements of this great work. But at the same time, I want to discuss its connection with the so-called paradoxes in set theory. There seems to be some agreement now that Cantor’s own understanding of the theory of transfinite numbers in that monograph did not contain an implicit contradiction; but there is less agreement about exactly why this is so and about the content of the theory itself. For various reasons, both historical and internal, the Grundlagen seems not to have been widely read compared to later works of Cantor, and to have been even less well understood. But even some of the more recent discussions of the work, while recognizing to some degree its unique character, misunderstand it on crucial points and fail to convey its true worth.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library||
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Erik Palmgren (2012). Constructivist and Structuralist Foundations: Bishop's and Lawvere's Theories of Sets. Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 163 (10):1384-1399.
Similar books and articles
Mary Tiles (1989). The Philosophy of Set Theory: An Historical Introduction to Cantor's Paradise. Dover Publications.
F. W. Lawvere (1994). Cohesive Toposes and Cantor's 'Lauter Einsen'. Philosophia Mathematica 2 (1):5-15.
Claire Ortiz Hill (1997). Did Georg Cantor Influence Edmund Husserl? Synthese 113 (1):145-170.
Anne Newstead (2009). Cantor on Infinity in Nature, Number, and the Divine Mind. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 83 (4):533-553.
I. Jane (2010). Idealist and Realist Elements in Cantor's Approach to Set Theory. Philosophia Mathematica 18 (2):193-226.
J. Ferreiros (2004). The Motives Behind Cantor’s Set Theory: Physical, Biological and Philosophical Questions. Science in Context 17 (1/2):1–35.
Christopher Menzel (1984). Cantor and the Burali-Forti Paradox. The Monist 67 (1):92-107.
Marcus Rossberg & Philip A. Ebert (2010). Cantor on Frege's Foundations of Arithmetic : Cantor's 1885 Review of Frege's Die Grundlagen der Arithmetik. History and Philosophy of Logic 30 (4):341-348.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads45 ( #107,788 of 1,924,716 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #417,761 of 1,924,716 )
How can I increase my downloads?