Abstract
The concept of vulnerability has been the topic of considerable discussion in research bioethics, largely because of dissatisfaction with early constructions of the concept that were based on subpopulations of research subjects. These subpopulations have attributes likely to undermine their capacity to provide autonomous informed consent: persons who are relatively or absolutely incapable of protecting their own interests through negotiations for informed consent. Several subpopulations were seen as requiring special protections, including children, pregnant women, prisoners, racial minorities, the economically disadvantaged, the very sick, and the institutionalized. Recent years have witnessed the identification of other subpopulations with attributes that could render them vulnerable, as well. For example, the Council for the International Organization of Medical Societies has named such potentially vulnerable groups as the homeless, nursing home residents, patients with incurable diseases, patients in the emergency department, employees, students, and members of communities who are unfamiliar with modern medicine.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1748-720x.2009.00351.x
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 60,842
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Vulnerable and the Susceptible.Michael H. Kottow - 2003 - Bioethics 17 (5-6):460-471.
The Ubiquity and Utility of the Therapeutic Misconception.Rebecca Dresser - 2002 - Social Philosophy and Policy 19 (2):271-294.
Reflections on “Vulnerability.”.Debra DeBruin - 2001 - Bioethics Examiner 5 (2):1-4.

View all 16 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Introduction: Vulnerability in Biomedical Research.Ana S. Iltis - 2009 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 37 (1):6-11.
Introduction: Vulnerability in Biomedical Research.Ana S. Iltis - 2009 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 37 (1):6-11.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Vulnerability as a Regulatory Category in Human Subject Research.Carl H. Coleman - 2009 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 37 (1):12-18.
An Ethical Analysis of the Barriers to Effective Pain Management.Ben A. Rich - 2000 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 9 (1):54-70.
Gender Differences: Implications for Pain Management.Ursula Wesselmann - 1997 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (3):470-471.
On Whether To Prefer Pain to Pass.Tom Dougherty - 2011 - Ethics 121 (3):521-537.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2016-02-04

Total views
4 ( #1,228,628 of 2,438,881 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #434,842 of 2,438,881 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes