AI ethics and the banality of evil

Ethics and Information Technology 23 (3):447-454 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper, I draw on Hannah Arendt’s notion of ‘banality of evil’ to argue that as long as AI systems are designed to follow codes of ethics or particular normative ethical theories chosen by us and programmed in them, they are Eichmanns destined to commit evil. Since intelligence alone is not sufficient for ethical decision making, rather than strive to program AI to determine the right ethical decision based on some ethical theory or criteria, AI should be concerned with avoiding making the wrong decisions, and this requires hardwiring the thinking activity as a prerequisite for decision making.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 104,143

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Exploring the Ethical Implications of AI Algorithms in Decision-Making Processes.Prof Rashmi Gourkar Atul Verma - 2024 - International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research in Science, Engineering and Technology 7 (6):11068-11072.
The Ethics of Artificial Intelligence in Military Applications.Dr Chul-soo Park - 2023 - Journal of Philosophical Criticism 6 (1):17-28.
Artificial Intelligent Systems and Ethical Agency.Reena Cheruvalath - 2023 - Journal of Human Values 29 (1):33-47.
Cognitive, emotive, and ethical aspects of decision making in humans and in AI.Iva Smit, Wendell Wallach & G. E. Lasker (eds.) - 2005 - Windsor, Ont.: International Institute for Advanced Studies in Systems Research and Cybernetics.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-03-26

Downloads
149 (#158,496)

6 months
56 (#100,348)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Payman Tajalli
Macquarie University (PhD)