Enactive Realism

Tradition and Discovery 38 (1):43-59 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Polanyi and Merleau-Ponty are often viewed as arguing for philosophical positions that are generally non-Cartesian. Despite their broadly compatible orientations, their overall projects differ at key junctures. What I have called Polanyi’s “enactive realism” is an attempt to clarify what is unique about Polanyi’s epistemology. It is specifically Polanyi’s delineation of the hierarchical, stratified nature of comprehensive entities as brought forth by the structure of tacit knowing (not the hierarchy itself) that marks a key departure from Merleau-Ponty.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Embodied Knowing.Kyle Takaki - 2009 - Tradition and Discovery 36 (2):26-39.
The Trust Relationship.John C. Puddefoot - 1999 - Tradition and Discovery 26 (3):62-70.
Exploring Enactive Realism.Tom Roberts - 2012 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 20 (2):239-254.
Polanyi’s Problematic ‘Man in Thought’.S. R. Jha - 1999 - Tradition and Discovery 26 (3):15-23.
The Real As Meaningful.Phil Mullins - 1999 - Tradition and Discovery 26 (3):42-50.
Realism Redux: Gibson's Affordances Get a Well-Deserved Update.T. Ziemke - 2011 - Constructivist Foundations 7 (1):87-89.
Merleau-ponty and the mystery of perception.Taylor Carman - 2009 - Philosophy Compass 4 (4):630-638.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-03-18

Downloads
154 (#119,718)

6 months
1 (#1,510,037)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references