Biology and Philosophy 37 (2):1-22 (2022)

Authors
Pierrick Bourrat
Macquarie University
Abstract
Showing that the arithmetic mean number of offspring for a trait type often fails to be a predictive measure of fitness was a welcome correction to the philosophical literature on fitness. While the higher mathematical moments of a probability-weighted offspring distribution can influence fitness measurement in distinct ways, the geometric mean number of offspring is commonly singled out as the most appropriate measure. For it is well-suited to a compounding process and is sensitive to variance in offspring number. The geometric mean thus proves to be a predictively efficacious measure of fitness in examples featuring discrete generations and within- or between-generation variance in offspring output. Unfortunately, this advance has subsequently led some to conclude that the arithmetic mean is never a good measure of fitness and that the geometric mean should accordingly be the default measure of fitness. We show not only that the arithmetic mean is a perfectly reasonable measure of fitness so long as one is clear about what it refers to, but also that it functions as a more general measure when properly interpreted. It must suffice as a measure of fitness in any case where the geometric mean has been effectively deployed as a measure. We conclude with a discussion about why the mathematical equivalence we highlight cannot be dismissed as merely of mathematical interest.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s10539-022-09843-4
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,337
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Interpretations of Probability.Alan Hájek - 2007 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Adaptation and Evolutionary Theory.Robert N. Brandon - 1978 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 9 (3):181.

View all 30 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Absolute Arithmetic and Geometric Continua.Philip Ehrlich - 1986 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1986:237 - 246.
Musing on Means: Fitness, Expectation, and the Principles of Natural Selection.Bengt Autzen - 2020 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 71 (1):373-389.
The Hippo and the Fox: A Cautionary Tale.Margaret Atkins - 1992 - New Blackfriars 73 (864):497-506.
Pragmatic Justification (A Cautionary Tale).Nicolas Rescher - 1964 - Philosophy 39 (150):346 - 348.
Deconstruction: A Cautionary Tale.Joseph Margolis - 1986 - Journal of Aesthetic Education 20 (4):91.
The Abominable No-Men: A Cautionary Tale.James S. McCormick - 1990 - Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 33 (2):187.
A Cautionary Tale: The Whale Caller.Wendy Woodward - 2007 - Society and Animals 15 (3):299-300.
A Cautionary Tale of Technology.Muriel E. Ward - 2012 - Jona’s Healthcare Law, Ethics, and Regulation 14 (3):77-80.
The PSDA and Geriatric Psychiatry: A Cautionary Tale.Jan Marta - 1993 - Journal of Clinical Ethics 4 (1):80.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2022-03-28

Total views
3 ( #1,358,618 of 2,508,119 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #208,944 of 2,508,119 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes