Cumulative Argument, Sustaining Causes, and Miracles

Philosophia Christi 8 (2):219 - 226 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This is a critique of J. H. Sobel’s ’Logic and Theism’, defending the use of cumulative arguments, and the coherence of theistic metaphysics

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,322

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Against Miracles.John Collier - 1986 - Dialogue 25 (2):349-.
Martin on Miracles.Michael Almeida - 2007 - Philo 10 (1):27-34.
Marvels, miracles, and mundane order.S. Buckle - 2001 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 79 (1):1 – 31.
Prophecy, Early Modern Apologetics, and Hume's Argument against Miracles.Peter Harrison - 1999 - Journal of the History of Ideas 60 (2):241 - 256.
Hume's abject failure: the argument against miracles.John Earman - 2000 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Miracles: The Case for Theism.Leon Pearl - 1988 - American Philosophical Quarterly 25 (4):331 - 337.
Sobel on Arguments from Design.Richard Swinburne - 2006 - Philosophia Christi 8 (2):227 - 234.
Why the no‐miracles argument fails.Carl Matheson - 1998 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 12 (3):263 – 279.
The iterative conception of set.Thomas Forster - 2008 - Review of Symbolic Logic 1 (1):97-110.
Mackie's treatment of miracles.Richard Otte - 1996 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 39 (3):151-158.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-06-16

Downloads
26 (#592,813)

6 months
3 (#1,023,809)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Charles Taliaferro
St. Olaf College

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references