Public Affairs Quarterly 23 (4):325-335 (2009)
We “prepunish” a person if we punish her prior to the commission of her crime. This essay discusses our intuitions about the permissibility of prepunishment and the relationship between prepunishment and compatibilism about free will and determinism. It has recently been argued that compatibilism has particular trouble generating a principled objection to prepunishment. The failure to provide such an objection may be a problem for compatibilism if our moral intuitions strongly favor the prohibition of prepunishment. In defense of compatibilism, I argue that while no objection to prepunishment is entailed by the central tenets of compatibilism, this does not necessarily show that compatibilism conflicts with our moral intuitions. And while there may be no distinctly compatibilist objection to prepunishment, there are common-sense objections to prepunishment of which the compatibilist can make use, at least under actual-world circumstances. And, while these common-sense objections might be inoperative in certain non-actual circumstances, it is not clear that support for prepunishment would be unintuitive in these circumstances.
|Keywords||Prepunishment Moral Responsibility Compatibilism Saul Smilansky|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Prepunishment for Compatibilists: A Reply to Kearns.Saul Smilansky - 2008 - Analysis 68 (299):254–257.
A Compatibilist-Friendly Rejection of Prepunishment.Michael Robinson - 2010 - Philosophia 38 (3):589-594.
Determinism and Prepunishment: The Radical Nature of Compatibilism.Saul Smilansky - 2007 - Analysis 67 (296):347–349.
Compatibilism Can Resist Prepunishment: A Reply to Smilansky.Stephen Kearns - 2008 - Analysis 68 (299):250–253.
More Prepunishment for Compatibilists: A Reply to Beebee.Saul Smilansky - 2008 - Analysis 68 (299):260–263.
Compatibilism: The Argument From Shallowness.Saul Smilansky - 2003 - Philosophical Studies 115 (3):257-82.
The Contrariety of Compatibilist Positions.Saul Smilansky - 1991 - Journal of Philosophical Research 16:293-309.
Moral Theory and Modified Compatibilism.Michael S. McKenna - 1998 - Journal of Philosophical Research 23 (January):441-458.
The Elusiveness of Doxastic Compatibilism.Benjamin Bayer - 2015 - American Philosophical Quarterly 52 (3):233-252.
Is Hard Determinism a Form of Compatibilism?Jeremy Randel Koons - 2002 - Philosophical Forum 33 (1):81-99.
Future Law: Prepunishment and the Causal Theory of Verdicts.Roy Sorensen - 2006 - Noûs 40 (1):166–183.
Moral Shallowness, Metaphysical Megalomania, and Compatibilist-Fatalism.Stefaan E. Cuypers - 2013 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 16 (1):173-188.
The Smart Theory of Moral Responsibility and Desert.Richard Arneson - 2007 - In Serena Olsaretti (ed.), Desert and Justice. Clarendon Press.
Added to index2012-03-11
Total downloads19 ( #257,189 of 2,163,903 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #348,100 of 2,163,903 )
How can I increase my downloads?