Authors
Abstract
This paper considers the theoretical circumstances that urged Michel Foucault to analyse modern societies in terms of biopower. Georges Canguilhem’s account of the relations between science and the living forms an essential starting point for Foucault’s own later explorations, though the challenges posed by the molecular revolution in biology and François Jacob’s history of it allowed Foucault to extend and transform Canguilhem’s philosophy of error. Using archival research into his 1955–1956 course on “Science and Error,” I show that, for Canguilhem, it is inauthentic to treat a living being as an error, even if living things are capable of making errors in the domain of knowledge. The emergent molecular biology in the 1960s posed a grave challenge, however, since it suggested that individuals could indeed be errors of genetic reproduction. The paper discusses how Canguilhem and Foucault each responded to this by examining, among other texts, their respective reviews of Jacob’s The Logic of the Living. For Canguilhem this was an opportunity to reaffirm the creativity of life in the living individual, which is not a thing to be evaluated, but the source of values. For Foucault, drawing on Jacob’s work, this was the opportunity to develop a transformed account of valuation by posing biopower as the DNA of society. Despite their disagreements, the paper examines these three authors as different iterations of a historical epistemology attuned to errancy, error, and experimentation.
Keywords Canguilhem   Jacob   Foucault   Error   Life   Biopower   Molecular biology
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s40656-014-0023-0
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 63,393
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Bíos: Biopolitics and Philosophy.Roberto Esposito - 2008 - Univ of Minnesota Press.

View all 35 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Concept in Life and the Life of the Concept: Canguilhem’s Final Reckoning with Bergson.Alex Feldman - 2016 - Journal of French and Francophone Philosophy 24 (2):154-175.
Canguilhem, Foucault y la ontología política del vitalismo.Francisco Vázquez García - 2015 - Logos. Anales Del Seminario de Metafísica [Universidad Complutense de Madrid, España] 48:165-187.
Narrative and Epistemology: Georges Canguilhem's Concept of Scientific Ideology.Cristina Chimisso - 2015 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 54:64-73.
What is a Problem?Osborne Thomas - 2003 - History of the Human Sciences 16 (4):1-17.
The World is One Great Hospital.David-Olivier Gougelet - 2010 - Journal of French and Francophone Philosophy 18 (1):43-66.
The Concept of Individuality in Canguilhem's Philosophy of Biology.Jean Gayon - 1998 - Journal of the History of Biology 31 (3):305 - 325.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2017-10-17

Total views
7 ( #1,038,082 of 2,448,992 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #443,144 of 2,448,992 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes