Philosophical Quarterly 41 (July):301-15 (1991)
The authors argue that while meaning holism makes massive error possible, it does not, as Donald Davidson fears, threaten interpretability. Thus they hold, in opposition to Davidson, that meaning holism need not be constrained by an account of meaning according to which in the methodologically most basic cases the content of a belief is given by the cause of that belief. What ensures interpretability, they maintain, is not that speakers' beliefs are in the main true, but rather that beliefs have the contents they do because of events others can in principle identify and describe
|Keywords||Belief Holism Interpretation Language Meaning|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Wittgenstein, Locality and Rules.Carlo Penco - 2004 - In Annalisa Coliva & Eva Picardi (eds.), Wittgenstein Today. Il Poligrafo. pp. 249--74.
Moderate Holism and the Instability Thesis.Henry Jackman - 1999 - American Philosophical Quarterly 36 (4):361-69.
Holism Without Meaning: A Critical Review of Fodor and Lepore's Holism: A Shopper's Guide.Christopher Gauker - 1993 - Philosophical Psychology 6 (4):441-49.
Does Epistemological Holism Lead to Meaning Holism?Cesare Cozzo - 2002 - Topoi 21 (1-2):25-45.
Meaning Holism.Peter Pagin - 2006 - In Ernest Lepore & Barry C. Smith (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Language. Oxford University Press.
Holism and Radical Interpretation: The Limitations of a Formal Theory of Meaning.Karsten R. Stueber - 1997 - In Analyomen 2, Volume II: Philosophy of Language, Metaphysics. Hawthorne: De Gruyter.
Meaning Holism and Semantic Realism (Reprinted in Callaway 2008, Meaning Without Analyticity).H. G. Callaway - 1992 - Dialectica 46 (1):41-59.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads29 ( #173,107 of 2,153,830 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #398,274 of 2,153,830 )
How can I increase my downloads?