Religious Studies 26 (2):227 - 245 (1990)

Authors
Thomas Talbott
Willamette University
Abstract
According to some theists, God will never completely destroy moral evil or banish it from his creation entirely; instead, he will eventually confine moral evil to a specific region of his creation, a region known as hell, and those condemned to hell, having no hope of escape from it, will live out eternity in a state of estrangement from God as well as from each other. Let us call that the traditional doctrine of hell. Elsewhere I have argued that any form of theism which includes such a doctrine, even one that tries to preserve consistency by denying the universal love of God, is in fact logically inconsistent. But moderately conservative theists, as I have called them, have an argument for the traditional doctrine that some have found convincing, one that emphasizes libertarian free will. The argument is this. Because God is perfectly loving, he wills the good for every created person and wills the redemption of all who have fallen into evil; but because he has also given his loved ones the gift of freedom and some of them in fact exercise their freedom to reject him forever, it is simply not within his power, even as an omnipotent being, to redeem all of those who fall into evil. According to moderately conservative theists, therefore, the following hypothesis, which I shall call the Rejection Hypothesis , is at least possibly true: Some persons will, despite God's best efforts to save them, freely and irrevocably reject God and thus separate themselves from God forever
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S0034412500020382
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 64,132
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Middle Knowledge and the Problem of Evil.Robert Merrihew Adams - 1977 - American Philosophical Quarterly 14 (2):109-117.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Hell, Justice, and Freedom.Charles Seymour - 1998 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 43 (2):69-86.
Karma and the Problem of Evil: A Response to Kaufman.Monima Chadha & Nick Trakakis - 2007 - Philosophy East and West 57 (4):533-556.
The Injustice of Hell.S. Kershnar - 2005 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 58 (2):103-123.
Universalism and the Problem of Hell.Ioanna-Maria Patsalidou - 2012 - Philosophy Compass 7 (11):808-820.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Descartes on Divine Providence and Human Freedom.C. P. Ragland - 2005 - Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 87 (2):159-188.
Augustine's Compatibilism.Katherin A. Rogers - 2004 - Religious Studies 40 (4):415-435.
Freedom and Providence.Mark Pontifex - 1960 - New York: Hawthorn Books.
Providence and Freedom.Mark Pontifex - 1960 - London: Burns & Oates.
Siger of Brabant on Divine Providence and the Indeterminacy of Chance.Andrew Lazella - 2011 - International Philosophical Quarterly 51 (4):483-500.
The Destiny of Freedom: In Heidegger.Hans Ruin - 2008 - Continental Philosophy Review 41 (3):277-299.
Gersonides: Judaism Within the Limits of Reason.Seymour Feldman - 2010 - Littman Library of Jewish Civilization.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2011-05-29

Total views
104 ( #104,907 of 2,454,732 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #143,646 of 2,454,732 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes