Presentism remains

Erkenntnis:1-27 (forthcoming)
Abstract
Here I examine some recent attempts to provide a new way of thinking about the philosophy of time that question the central role of ‘presentness’ within the definition of presentism. The central concern raised by these critics turns on the intelligibility and theoretical usefulness of the term ‘is present’. My overarching aim is to at least challenge such concerns. I begin with arguments due to Deasy. Deasy develops a view that he calls ‘transientism’ and that he takes to be a well-motivated version of presentism. I show that both this way of thinking about presentism and the argument supposedly motivating it all fail. I then move to an argument due to Correia and Rosenkrantz. Correia and Rosenkrantz purport to show that presentism can be salvaged without making recourse to the term ‘is present’. I demonstrate that their arguments fail. I then move on to a view, proposed and defended by Merricks, Tallant, and Zimmerman, and show that it has the wherewithal to meet the challenges raised by Williamson who, as noted above, raises genuine concerns about our capacity to define presentism.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2017
DOI 10.1007/s10670-017-9965-4
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 32,607
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
What is Presentism?Daniel Deasy - 2017 - Noûs 51 (2):378-397.
A Defense of Presentism.Ned Markosian - 2004 - Oxford Studies in Metaphysics 1 (3):47-82.
From Nihilism to Monism.Jonathan Schaffer - 2007 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 85 (2):175 – 191.
Presentism and the Space-Time Manifold.Dean Zimmerman - 2011 - In Craig Callender (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Time. Oxford University Press. pp. 163--246.

View all 33 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Time for Presence?Jonathan Tallant - 2010 - Philosophia 38 (2):271-280.
Defining Existence Presentism.Jonathan Tallant - 2014 - Erkenntnis 79 (S3):479-501.
Characterizing Presentism.McKinnon Neil - 2013 - In Roberto Ciuni, Kristie Miller & Giuliano Torrengo (eds.), New Papers on the Present: Focus on Presentism. Munich: Philosophia Verlag. pp. 13-30.
Demarcating Presentism.Christian Wuthrich - 2012 - In Henk de Regt, Samir Okasha & Stephan Hartmann (eds.), EPSA Philosophy of Science: Amsterdam 2009. Springer. pp. 441--450.
Presentism and Grounding Past Truths.Matthew Davidson - 2013 - In Roberto Ciuni, Giuliano Torrengo & Kristie Miller (eds.), New Papers on the Present: Focus on Presentism. Verlag. pp. 153-172.
Quantitative Parsimony and the Metaphysics of Time: Motivating Presentism.Jonathan Tallant - 2013 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 87 (3):688-705.
A Defense of Presentism in a Relativistic Setting.Mark Hinchliff - 2000 - Philosophy of Science 67 (3):586.
Moderate Presentism.Francesco Orilia - 2016 - Philosophical Studies 173 (3):589-607.
A Defense of Transient Presentism.M. Oreste Fiocco - 2007 - American Philosophical Quarterly 44 (3):191 - 212.
Added to PP index
2017-12-01

Total downloads
48 ( #124,592 of 2,235,734 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
18 ( #25,932 of 2,235,734 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature