Faith and Philosophy 25 (3):300-316 (2008)

Authors
Thomas Talbott
Willamette University
Abstract
In response to Lynne Rudder Baker’s intriguing paper, “Why Christians Should Not Be Libertarians,” I suggest that, even if a Christian simply lets the chips fall where they may with respect to the dispute between libertarians and compatibilists, a Christian should not be a determinist. I also offer for consideration a rather controversial non-Augustinian explanation for the near universality and seeming inevitability of human sin.
Keywords Contemporary Philosophy  Philosophy and Religion
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 0739-7046
DOI faithphil200825329
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 64,261
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Material Persons and the Doctrine of Resurrection.Lynne Rudder Baker - 2001 - Faith and Philosophy 18 (2):151-167.
The Future of Theological Ethics.Raymond Geuss - 2012 - Studies in Christian Ethics 25 (2):160-168.
Determinists and Libertarians.P. H. Nowell Smith - 1954 - Mind 63 (251):317-337.
Determinists and Libertarians.P. H. Nowell-Smith - 1954 - Mind 63 (July):317-337.
Is There a Human Nature?Mikael Stenmark - 2012 - Zygon 47 (4):890-902.
Paul and Ethics.Pheme Perkins - 1984 - Interpretation 38 (3):268-280.
The American Christians and the State of Israel.Mohd Afandi Salleh & Mohd Fauzi Abu-Hussin - 2013 - Journal for the Study of Religions and Ideologies 12 (34):152-172.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2011-01-09

Total views
42 ( #257,605 of 2,455,872 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
7 ( #98,342 of 2,455,872 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes