Disruptive implications of legal positivism's social efficacy thesis

In Torben Spaak (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Legal Positivism. Cambridge University Press (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Legal Positivism and the Moral Aim Thesis.David Plunkett - 2013 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 33 (3):563-605.
The Separability Thesis: A Comparison Between Natural Law and Legal Positivism.Owen Jeffrey Crocker - 2022 - Sophia: Undergraduate Journal of Philosophy 16 (1):60-71.
The Metaphysics of Legal Positivism in the Light of Phenomenology of Law.Tomasz Bekrycht - 2018 - Avant: Trends in Interdisciplinary Studies 9 (1):21-29.
Legal positivism: Still descriptive and morally neutral.Andrei Marmor - 2006 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 26 (4):683-704.
Three separation theses.James Morauta - 2004 - Law and Philosophy 23 (2):111-135.
Human Rights and the Debate on Legal Positivism.Delamar José Volpato Dutra - 2015 - Dialogue and Universalism 25 (1):264-273.
Realism and Positivism.David Frydrych - 2022 - Jurisprudence 13 (4).
Legal positivism.Mario Jori (ed.) - 1992 - New York, NY: New York University Press.
Law as a moral judgment.Deryck Beyleveld - 1986 - London: Sweet & Maxwell. Edited by Roger Brownsword.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-11-22

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references