Buddhist Logic

Routledge Encyclopaedia of Philosophy (forthcoming)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Buddhist philosophers have investigated the techniques and methodologies of debate and argumentation which are important aspects of Buddhist intellectual life. This was particularly the case in India, where Buddhism and Buddhist philosophy originated. But these investigations have also engaged philosophers in China, Japan, Korea and Tibet, and many other parts of the world that have been influenced by Buddhism and Buddhist philosophy. Several elements of the Buddhist tradition of philosophy are thought to be part of this investigation. There are interesting reasoning patterns discernible in the writings of Buddhist philosophers. For instance, the Mādhyamika philosopher Nāgārjuna presents arguments for the emptiness of all things in terms of catuṣkoṭi (four ‘corners’: roughly speaking, truth, false, both, neither). There are also the Indian vāda (debate) literature and Tibetan bsdus grwa (collected topics) that list techniques of debates. The main interest here is the tradition of Buddhist philosophy, sometimes referred to as Pramāṇavāda, whose central figures are Dignāga (approx. 480–540 CE) and Dharmakīrti (6th– 7th CE). This philosophy is understood to be the Buddhist school of logic-epistemology. ‘Pramāṇavāda’ is not a doxographical term traditionally used to refer to a recognised school of Buddhist philosophy. It is a conventional term that is sometimes used in modern literature. Nevertheless, in what follows, we think of it as a tradition within Buddhist philosophy and ‘Buddhist logic’ refers to what is developed in this tradition. Buddhist logicians have systematically analysed the kind of reasoning involved in acquiring knowledge. They hold that there are valid ways to reason that are productive of knowledge. In what follows, some of the main elements of their analyses will be described. Note, however, that, while exegetical studies of Buddhist texts are important, we must step back from them and consider what is involved in taking a Buddhist approach to logic in light of modern formal logic. This analysis will be done against the backdrop of the contemporary literature on logic and related subjects in contemporary philosophy to make sense of the logical studies by Buddhist logicians.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Buddhist Logic from a Global Perspective.Koji Tanaka - 2021 - In David Ludwig & Inkeri Koskinen (eds.), Global Epistemologies and Philosophies of Science. New York: Routeldge. pp. 274-285.
Western Studies in Indian Buddhist Logic-Epistemology.Yuguang Liu - 1998 - Philosophy and Culture 25 (12):1160-1173.
A millennium of Buddhist logic.Alex Wayman - 1999 - Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass Publishers.
Buddhist logic.F. I. Shcherbatskoĭ - 1958 - 's-Gravenhage,: Mouton.
What is the "logic" in buddhist logic?R. Lance Factor - 1983 - Philosophy East and West 33 (2):183-188.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-01-04

Downloads
2,442 (#4,718)

6 months
652 (#1,744)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Koji Tanaka
Australian National University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Frege, Kant, and the logic in logicism.John MacFarlane - 2002 - Philosophical Review 111 (1):25-65.
The Character of Logic in India.Bimal Krishna Matilal - 1998 - Albany, NY, USA: SUNY Press.
Buddhist formal logic.R. S. Y. Chi - 1969 - Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.
Buddhist Philosophy of Logic.Koji Tanaka - 2013 - In Emmanuel Steven Michael (ed.), Blackwell Companion to Buddhist Philosophy. Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 320-330.
Dharmakīrti.Vincent Eltschinger - 2010 - Revue Internationale de Philosophie 253 (3):397-440.

View all 6 references / Add more references