Philosophical Studies (forthcoming)

Authors
Attila Tanyi
University of Tromsø
Stephen K. McLeod
University of Liverpool
Daniel Hill
University of Liverpool
Abstract
We address the ethics of scenarios in which one party (the ‘agent’) entraps, intentionally tempts, or intentionally tests the virtue of another (the ‘target’). We classify, in a new manner, three distinct types of acts that are of concern, namely acts of entrapment, of (mere) intentional temptation and of (mere) virtue testing. Our classification is, for each kind of scenario, of itself neutral concerning the question whether the agent acts permissibly (and concerning the extent to which the target is culpable). We explain why acts of entrapment are more ethically objectionable than like acts of (mere) intentional temptation and why these, in turn, are more ethically objectionable than like acts of (mere) virtue testing. Along the way, we scrutinize, and eventually reject, the view that acts of entrapment are ethically unacceptable because intentional temptation is involved in entrapment. (The article touches upon, but is not about, the question of culpability.)
Keywords entrapment  ethics  intentions   moral alliance   procurement   purist principle  temptation   virtue testing
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11098-021-01772-4
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Asserting.Robert Brandom - 1983 - Noûs 17 (4):637-650.
Asserting.Robert Brandom - 1980 - Journal of Philosophy 77 (11):766-767.
To Lie or to Mislead?Felix Timmermann & Emanuel Viebahn - 2021 - Philosophical Studies 178 (5):1481-1501.

View all 16 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Concept of Entrapment.Daniel J. Hill, Stephen K. McLeod & Attila Tanyi - 2018 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 12 (4):539-554.
Entrapment, Culpability, and Legitimacy.Hochan Kim - 2020 - Law and Philosophy 39 (1):67-91.
The Problem with Entrapment.Dan Squires - 2006 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 26 (2):351-376.
What is Wrong with Entrapment?Paul M. Hughes - 2004 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 42 (1):45-60.
Against Jeffrey Howard on Entrapment.Jonathan Stanhope - 2019 - Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 15 (3).
Entrapment Through the Lens of the Actio Libera in Causa.Leo Katz - 2013 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 7 (3):587-595.
Entrapment in the Net?Walter Sinnott-Armstrong - 1999 - Ethics and Information Technology 1 (2):95-104.
Entrapment as an Intrument in the Course of Making Evidence in Criminal Procedure.Raimundas Jurka - 2013 - Jurisprudencija: Mokslo darbu žurnalas 20 (1):249-265.
Virtue as the Basis of Engineering Ethics.Douglas J. Crawford-Brown - 1997 - Science and Engineering Ethics 3 (4):481-489.
The Temptation of God Incarnate.David Werther - 1993 - Religious Studies 29 (1):47-50.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2020-12-29

Total views
189 ( #60,831 of 2,498,254 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
67 ( #11,714 of 2,498,254 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes