Piac és igazságosság? (Market and Justice?)

Napvilág (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The aim of the book is to uncover the relation between market and justice through the critical examination of the work of Friedrich Hayek. The book argues for the following thesis: the institution of free market is not the only candidate social system; substantial, not merely formal distributive justice must become the central virtue of our social institutions. Notwithstanding its achievements and virtues, the Hayekian theory makes a simple mistake by equivocating possible social systems, dividing them into two groups. One is the world of liberty and free market where people follow the general and abstract rules of conduct, accepting the outcome of market processes, be those good or bad. The other is the world of coercion and repression in which organized distributive instituions dominate and free market is non-existent. According to Hayek’s famous thesis, although freedom is possible in the latter world, we are nevertheless already on the road to serfdom: this fate is inevitable. In this dichotomy the decision is indeed simple. If justice is nothing else but the Trojan horse of oppression, then it is indeed a dangerous and unworkable ideal. However, if this dichotomy does not hold and there is a variety of acceptable social systems, then justice may become the central virtue of institutions, thereby contradicting Hayek’s theory. In the second half of the book I present this alternative, justice-governed social system in more detail.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Hayek, Social Justice, and the Market: Reply to Johnston.Edward Feser - 1998 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 12 (3):269-281.
Hayek's Attack on Social Justice.David Johnston - 1997 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 11 (1):81-100.
Is the Idea of Social Justice Meaningful?David Johnston - 1997 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 11 (4):607-614.
Hayek on Social Justice: Reply to Lukes and Johnston.Edward Feser - 1997 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 11 (4):581-606.
Of Fair Markets and Distributive Justice.Mukesh Sud & Craig V. VanSandt - 2011 - Journal of Business Ethics 99 (S1):131-142.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-01

Downloads
1,245 (#4,991)

6 months
57 (#15,727)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Attila Tanyi
University of Tromsø

Citations of this work

A Harmadik Út értékrendszere (The Values of the Third Way).Attila Tanyi - 2007 - Progressive Politics (Progressziv Politika) 2 (3):8-30.
Rawls különbözeti elve (Rawls’ Difference Principle).Attila Tanyi - 2007 - Hungarian Review of Political Science (Politikatudomanyi Szemle) 16 (2):125-150.

Add more citations

References found in this work

What is the Point of Equality.Elizabeth Anderson - 1999 - Ethics 109 (2):287-337.
Kantian Constructivism in Moral Theory.John Rawls - 1930 - Journal of Philosophy 77 (9):515-572.
Equality and Equal Opportunity for Welfare.Richard J. Arneson - 1989 - Philosophical Studies 56 (1):77 - 93.
What is Equality? Part 1: Equality of Welfare.Ronald Dworkin - 1981 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 10 (3):185-246.

View all 32 references / Add more references