Passionate Speech: On the Uses and Abuses of Anger in Public Debate

Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 89:153-176 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Anger dominates debates in the public sphere. In this article I argue that there are diverse forms of anger that merit different responses. My focus is especially on two types of anger that I label respectively arrogant and resistant. The first is the characteristic defensive response of those who unwarrantedly arrogate special privileges for themselves. The second is often a source of insight and a form of moral address. I detail some discursive manifestations of these two types of anger. I show that arrogant anger is responsible for attempts to intimidate and humiliate others with whom one disagrees. Whilst resistant anger can be intimidating, it is also essential in communicating moral demands.

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

Arrogance, anger and debate.Alessandra Tanesini - 2018 - Symposion: Theoretical and Applied Inquiries in Philosophy and Social Sciences 5 (2):213-227.
Political and Antipolitical Anger.Jessica Vargas González - 2024 - Feminist Philosophy Quarterly 10 (3).
"On Anger, Silence and Epistemic Injustice".Alison Bailey - 2018 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 84:93-115.
Turn Anger into Passionate Disagreement?Mara-Daria Cojocaru - 2020 - European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy 12 (2).
Virtuous and Vicious Anger.Bommarito Nicolas - 2017 - Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 11 (3):1-28.
Anger and its desires.Laura Silva - 2021 - European Journal of Philosophy 29 (4):1115-1135.
Anger as a Political Emotion: A Phenomenological Perspective.Celine Leboeuf - 2017 - In Myisha Cherry & Owen Flanagan (eds.), The Moral Psychology of Anger. London: Rowman & Littlefield. pp. 15-30.
Anger, Detachment and the First Person.Liu Pengbo - 2021 - Australasian Philosophical Review 5 (4):412-417.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-05-26

Downloads
489 (#58,432)

6 months
91 (#68,247)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Alessandra Tanesini
Cardiff University

Citations of this work

WTF?! Covid-19, Indignation, and the Internet.Lucy Osler - 2023 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 22 (5):1-20.
Political anger, affective injustice, and civic education.Michalinos Zembylas - 2024 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 57 (6):1176-1192.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Aptness of Anger.Amia Srinivasan - 2017 - Journal of Political Philosophy 26 (2):123-144.
Speech acts and unspeakable acts.Rae Langton - 1993 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 22 (4):293-330.
The Moralistic Fallacy.Daniel Jacobson - 2000 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 61 (1):65-90.
The Moralistic Fallacy: On the 'Appropriateness' of Emotions.Justin D'Arms & Daniel Jacobson - 2000 - Philosophical and Phenomenological Research 61 (1):65-90.
"Calm down, dear": intellectual arrogance, silencing and ignorance.Alessandra Tanesini - 2016 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 90 (1):71-92.

View all 22 references / Add more references