Australasian Journal of Philosophy 94 (2):362-377 (2016)

Authors
Weng Hong Tang
National University of Singapore
Abstract
What are the conditions under which suspension of belief—or suspension, for short—is justified? Process reliabilists hold that our beliefs are justified if and only if these are produced or sustained by reliable cognitive processes. But they have said relatively little about suspension. Perhaps they think that we may easily extend an account of justified belief to deal with justified suspension. But it's not immediately clear how we may do so; in which case, evidentialism has a distinct advantage over reliabilism. In this paper, I consider some proposals as to how process reliabilists might seek to account for justified suspension. Although several of these proposals do not work, two are promising. The first such proposal appeals to the notion of propositional justification; the second involves weaving evidentialist elements into reliabilism. I'll argue that the second proposal is better than the first.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2016
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1080/00048402.2015.1057515
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

What is Justified Belief?Alvin Goldman - 1979 - In George Pappas (ed.), Justification and Knowledge. Boston: D. Reidel. pp. 1-25.
Knowledge in a Social World.Alvin Ira Goldman - 1999 - Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

View all 33 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The Ethics of Belief.Andrew Chignell - 2016 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Suspending is Believing.Thomas Raleigh - 2019 - Synthese (3):1-26.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

How to Be a Reliabilist.Jonathan Kvanvig - 1986 - American Philosophical Quarterly 23 (2):189 - 198.
Reliabilism: Holistic or Simple?Jeffrey Dunn - 2012 - Episteme 9 (3):225-233.
Can Virtue Reliabilism Explain the Value of Knowledge?Berit Brogaard - 2006 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 36 (3):335-354.
Reliabilism.Alvin Goldman - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
The Diagonal and the Demon.Juan Comesaña - 2002 - Philosophical Studies 110 (3):249 - 266.
Three Kinds of Reliabilism.Frank Hofmann - 2013 - Philosophical Explorations 16 (1):59 - 80.
Rational Agnosticism and Degrees of Belief.Jane Friedman - 2013 - Oxford Studies in Epistemology 4:57.
Faith and the Suspension of the Ethical in Fear and Trembling.Andrew Cross - 2003 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 46 (1):3 – 28.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2015-07-01

Total views
254 ( #39,055 of 2,456,095 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
17 ( #40,621 of 2,456,095 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes