Between the Species 13 (9):7 (2009)
In this paper I will argue that Regan’s subjects-of-a-life account is epistemically irresponsible. Firstly, in making so many epistemic claims. Secondly in making the claims themselves.
|Keywords||Tom Regan subjects-of-a-life Epistemic irresponsible|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
On Interpreting Kant's Thinker as Wittgenstein's 'I'.Patricia Kitcher - 2000 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 61 (1):33-63.
In Praise of Epistemic Irresponsibility: How Lazy and Ignorant Can You Be?Michael A. Bishop - 2000 - Synthese 122 (1-2):179 - 208.
Reducing Responsibility: An Evidentialist Account of Epistemic Blame.Trent Dougherty - 2012 - European Journal of Philosophy 20 (4):534-547.
Cultural Variations in Folk Epistemic Intuitions.Finn Spicer - 2010 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 1 (4):515-529.
Epistemic Anxiety and Adaptive Invariantism.Jennifer Nagel - 2010 - Philosophical Perspectives 24 (1):407-435.
Discussion Note: Distributed Cognition in Epistemic Cultures.Ronald N. Giere - 2002 - Philosophy of Science 69 (4):637-644.
Faultless Ignorance: Strengths and Limitations of Epistemic Definitions of Confabulation.Lisa Bortolotti & Rochelle Cox - 2009 - Consciousness and Cognition 18 (4):952-965.
Added to index2009-12-02
Total downloads41 ( #126,406 of 2,170,068 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #345,514 of 2,170,068 )
How can I increase my downloads?