Between the Species 13 (9):7 (2009)

Authors
Julia Tanner
Durham University
Abstract
In this paper I will argue that Regan’s subjects-of-a-life account is epistemically irresponsible. Firstly, in making so many epistemic claims. Secondly in making the claims themselves.
Keywords Tom Regan  subjects-of-a-life  Epistemic irresponsible
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 50,217
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

What is It Like to Be a Bat?Thomas Nagel - 1974 - Philosophical Review 83 (October):435-50.
The Case for Animal Rights.Tom Regan - 2009 - In Steven M. Cahn (ed.), Noûs. Oxford University Press. pp. 425-434.
What is It Like to Be a Bat.Thomas Nagel - 1974 - E-Journal Philosophie der Psychologie 5.

View all 81 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

On Interpreting Kant’s Thinker as Wittgenstein’s ‘I’.Patricia Kitcher - 2000 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 61 (1):33-63.
Responsible Religious Belief.Yeager Hudson - 2000 - Social Philosophy Today 16:215-224.
Epistemic Anxiety and Adaptive Invariantism.Jennifer Nagel - 2010 - Philosophical Perspectives 24 (1):407-435.
Cultural Variations in Folk Epistemic Intuitions.Finn Spicer - 2010 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 1 (4):515-529.
Reducing Responsibility: An Evidentialist Account of Epistemic Blame.Trent Dougherty - 2012 - European Journal of Philosophy 20 (4):534-547.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-12-02

Total views
55 ( #167,348 of 2,324,957 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #671,788 of 2,324,957 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes