The Epistemic irresponsibility of the subjects-of-a-life account

Between the Species 13 (9):7 (2009)
Abstract
In this paper I will argue that Regan’s subjects-of-a-life account is epistemically irresponsible. Firstly, in making so many epistemic claims. Secondly in making the claims themselves.
Keywords Tom Regan  subjects-of-a-life  Epistemic irresponsible
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 27,678
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
On Interpreting Kant's Thinker as Wittgenstein's 'I'.Patricia Kitcher - 2000 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 61 (1):33-63.
Reducing Responsibility: An Evidentialist Account of Epistemic Blame.Trent Dougherty - 2012 - European Journal of Philosophy 20 (4):534-547.
Cultural Variations in Folk Epistemic Intuitions.Finn Spicer - 2010 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 1 (4):515-529.
Epistemic Anxiety and Adaptive Invariantism.Jennifer Nagel - 2010 - Philosophical Perspectives 24 (1):407-435.
Responsible Religious Belief.Yeager Hudson - 2000 - Social Philosophy Today 16:215-224.

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2009-12-02

Total downloads

41 ( #126,406 of 2,170,068 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #345,514 of 2,170,068 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums