Business and Society 56 (3):391-418 (2017)
Authors |
|
Abstract |
Although high-performance human resource practices do not directly affect corporate social performance strengths, they do positively affect CSP strengths in companies that are highly innovative or have high levels of slack. High-performance human resource management practices also directly and negatively affect CSP concerns. Drawing on the resource-based view and using secondary data from an objective, third-party database, the authors develop and test hypotheses about how high-performance HRM affects a company’s CSP strengths and concerns. Findings suggest that HRM and innovation are important capabilities because they create and enhance other capabilities.
|
Keywords | corporate social responsibility corporate social performance human resource management high-performance human resource management innovation CSP CSR |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
ISBN(s) | |
DOI | 10.1177/0007650315586594 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
The Corporate Social Performance and Corporate Financial Performance Debate.John F. Mahon - 1997 - Business and Society 36 (1):5-31.
The Corporate Social Performance and Corporate Financial Performance Debate Twenty-Five Years of Incomparable Research.Jennifer J. Griffin & John F. Mahon - 1997 - Business and Society 36 (1):5-31.
Corporate Social Performance as a Competitive Advantage in Attracting a Quality Workforce.Daniel W. Greening & Daniel B. Turban - 2000 - Business and Society 39 (3):254-280.
Measurement of Corporate Social Action Discovering Taxonomy in the Kinder Lydenburg Domini Ratings Data.James E. Mattingly & Shawn L. Berman - 2006 - Business and Society 45 (1):20-46.
Corporate Social Responsibility and Employee Commitment.Jane Collier & Rafael Esteban - 2007 - Business Ethics, the Environment and Responsibility 16 (1):19–33.
View all 21 references / Add more references
Citations of this work BETA
Why Architecture Does Not Matter: On the Fallacy of Sustainability Balanced Scorecards.Tobias Hahn & Frank Figge - 2018 - Journal of Business Ethics 150 (4):919-935.
Does GRI Sustainability Reporting Pay Off? An Empirical Investigation of Publicly Listed Firms in China.Lujie Chen, Fu Jia, Guido Orzes & Yang Yang - 2021 - Business and Society 60 (7):1738-1772.
Moving Beyond the Link Between HRM and Economic Performance: A Study on the Individual Reactions of HR Managers and Professionals to Sustainable HRM.Marco Guerci, Adelien Decramer, Thomas Van Waeyenberg & Ina Aust - 2018 - Journal of Business Ethics 160 (3):783-800.
Similar books and articles
Collectivism, Corporate Social Responsibility, and Resource Advantages in Retailing.Yu-Chiang Hu & Chia-Ching Fatima Wang - 2009 - Journal of Business Ethics 86 (1):1-13.
Examination on Philosophy-Based Management of Contemporary Japanese Corporations: Philosophy, Value Orientation and Performance.Yingyan Wang - 2009 - Journal of Business Ethics 85 (1):1-12.
The Impact of Human Resource Management on Environmental Performance: An Employee-Level Study.Pascal Paillé, Yang Chen, Olivier Boiral & Jiafei Jin - 2014 - Journal of Business Ethics 121 (3):1-16.
Corporate Social Responsibility and Its Impact on Firms' Investment Policy, Organizational Structure, and Performance.Otgontsetseg Erhemjamts, Qian Li & Anand Venkateswaran - 2013 - Journal of Business Ethics 118 (2):395-412.
An Exploratory Analysis of Corporate Social Responsibility and Disclosure.Cedric Dawkins & John Fraas - 2013 - Business and Society 52 (2):245-281.
For All Good Reasons: Role of Values in Organizational Sustainability. [REVIEW]Liviu Florea, Yu Ha Cheung & Neil C. Herndon - 2013 - Journal of Business Ethics 114 (3):393-408.
Responsible Management, Incentive Systems, and Productivity.Ivan Hilliard - 2013 - Journal of Business Ethics 118 (2):365-377.
Corporate Social and Financial Performance: An Extended Stakeholder Theory, and Empirical Test with Accounting Measures. [REVIEW]Gerwin Van der Laan, Hans Van Ees & Arjen Van Witteloostuijn - 2008 - Journal of Business Ethics 79 (3):299-310.
The Heterogeneous Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility Activities That Target Different Stakeholders.Kiyoung Chang, Incheol Kim & Ying Li - 2014 - Journal of Business Ethics 125 (2):1-24.
Prediction in Social Science - The Case of Research on the Human Resource Management-Organisational Performance Link.SteveAnthony FleetwoodHesketh - 2006 - Journal of Critical Realism 5 (2):228-250.
Corporate Social Performance and Attractiveness as an Employer to Different Job Seeking Populations.Heather Schmidt Albinger & Sarah J. Freeman - 2000 - Journal of Business Ethics 28 (3):243 - 253.
Effectiveness of the KLD Social Ratings as a Measure of Workforce Diversity and Corporate Governance.Jingoo Kang - 2015 - Business and Society 54 (5):599-631.
Do Investors Value a Firm’s Commitment to Social Activities?Waymond Rodgers, Hiu Lam Choy & Andrés Guiral - 2013 - Journal of Business Ethics 114 (4):607-623.
Analysis of Social Performance in the Spanish Financial Industry Through Public Data. A Proposal.Marta de la Cuesta-González, María Jesús Muñoz-Torres & María Ángeles Fernández-Izquierdo - 2006 - Journal of Business Ethics 69 (3):289-304.
Value Creation Through Social Strategy.Ned Kock, David Allen & Bryan Husted - 2015 - Business and Society 54 (2):147-186.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2017-02-16
Total views
1,268 ( #4,385 of 2,504,866 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
126 ( #5,421 of 2,504,866 )
2017-02-16
Total views
1,268 ( #4,385 of 2,504,866 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
126 ( #5,421 of 2,504,866 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads