Authors
Attila Tanyi
University of Tromsø
Stephen K. McLeod
University of Liverpool
Abstract
Our initial aim is to characterize, in a manner more precise than before, what Rawls calls the “analytical” method of arrival at a list of basic liberties. As we understand it, this method employs one or more general conditions that, under any just social order whatever, putative entitlements must meet in order for them to be among the basic liberties encompassed, within some just social order, by Rawls’s first principle of justice (i.e., the liberty principle). We then argue that the general conditions that feature in Rawls’s own version of the analytical method, which employ the notion of necessity, are too stringent. They ultimately fail to deliver as basic certain particular liberties that, we argue, should be encompassed within any fully adequate scheme of liberties. In order to address this shortcoming, we provide a significantly amended, disjunctive, general condition. This replaces Rawls’s necessity condition with a probabilistic condition and it also appeals to the principle of legitimacy. We defend our new approach both as apt to feature in applications of the analytical method and as adequately grounded in justice as fairness as Rawls articulates the theory’s fundamental ideas.
Keywords basic liberties  enabling  freedom of expression  moral powers  political legitimacy  political satire  John Rawls
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Justice as Fairness: A Restatement.C. L. Ten - 2003 - Mind 112 (447):563-566.
Political Liberalism by John Rawls. [REVIEW]Philip Pettit - 1994 - Journal of Philosophy 91 (4):215-220.
Rawls.Samuel Freeman - 2007 - Routledge.
Index.John Tomasi - 2012 - In Free Market Fairness. Princeton University Press. pp. 333-350.

View all 26 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Basic Liberties, the Moral Powers and Workplace Democracy.Stephen K. McLeod - 2018 - Ethics, Politics and Society 1:232–261.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Political Liberalism, Basic Liberties, and Legal Paternalism.William Glod - 2010 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 48 (2):177-196.
All Liberty is Basic.Jessica Flanigan - 2018 - Res Publica 24 (4):455-474.
Basic Liberties, the Moral Powers and Workplace Democracy.Stephen K. McLeod - 2018 - Ethics, Politics and Society 1:232–261.
The Liberty Principle and Universal Health Care.Benjamin Sachs - 2008 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 18 (2):pp. 149-172.
Freedom, Money and Justice as Fairness.Blain Neufeld - 2017 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 16 (1):70-92.
Are Economic Liberties Basic Rights?Jeppe von Platz - 2014 - Politics, Philosophy, and Economics 13 (1):23-44.
Marxism, Dictatorship, and the Abolition of Rights.David Gordon - 1986 - Social Philosophy and Policy 3 (2):145.
Dream Capitalism.Chris Pierson - 2015 - Res Publica 21 (4):383-395.
The Fair Value of Economic Liberty.Daniel Layman - 2015 - Res Publica 21 (4):413-428.
Basic Liberties and Global Justice.Gillian Brock - 2006 - Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 19 (2).
Are Economic Liberties Basic Rights?Jeppe von Platz - 2014 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 13 (1):23-44.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2018-06-15

Total views
116 ( #76,671 of 2,324,560 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
20 ( #32,836 of 2,324,560 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes