Identity and probability in Everett's multiverse

There are currently several versions of Everett's relative state interpretation of quantum mechanics, responding to a number of perceived problems for the original proposal. One of those problems is whether Everett's idea is in accord with the standard 'probabilistic' interpretation implicit in the Born rule. I argue in defence of what appears to be Everett's original view on this. The contribution I aim to make is a more complete discussion of the central issues of the identity of objects and observers over time and how the concept of expectation can be applied when all 'possible' outcomes of a measurement process are regarded as actually occurring.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1093/bjps/51.1.99
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 26,173
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Everett and Structure.David Wallace - 2003 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 34 (1):87-105.
Many Worlds and Schrodinger's First Quantum Theory.V. Allori, S. Goldstein, R. Tumulka & N. Zanghi - 2011 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 62 (1):1-27.
Worlds in the Everett Interpretation.David Wallace - 2002 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 33 (4):637-661.

View all 12 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

23 ( #214,283 of 2,152,503 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

2 ( #281,037 of 2,152,503 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums