Is professional ethics grounded in general ethical principles?

Theoretical and Applied Ethics 3 (1):61-80 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article questions the commonly held view that professional ethics is grounded in general ethical principles, in particular, respect for client (or patient) autonomy and beneficence in the treatment of clients (or patients). Although these are admirable as general ethical principles, we argue that there is considerable logical difficulty in applying them to the professional-client relationship. The transition from general principles to professional ethics cannot be made because the intended conclusion applies differently to each of the parties involved, whereas the premise is a general principle that applies equally to both parties. It is widely accepted that professionals are required to recognize that clients or patients possess rights to autonomy that are more than the general rights to personal autonomy accepted in ordinary social life, and that professionals are expected to display beneficence toward their clients that is more than the beneficence expected of anyone in ordinary social life. The comparative component of professional ethics is an intrinsic feature of the professional situation, and thus it cannot be bypassed in working out a proper professional ethics. Thus, we contend, the proper professional treatment of clients or patients has not been explained by appeal to general ethical principles.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Ground of Professional Ethics.Daryl Koehn - 1994 - New York: Routledge.
Ethics for addiction professionals.LeClair Bissell - 1987 - Center City, Minn.: Hazelden. Edited by James E. Royce.
The Pedagogic Value of General Moral Principles in Professional Ethics.Peter Hobson & Adrian Walsh - 1998 - Professional Ethics, a Multidisciplinary Journal 6 (3):33-48.
The Pedagogic Value of General Moral Principles in Professional Ethics.Adrian Walsh - 1998 - Professional Ethics, a Multidisciplinary Journal 6 (3-4):33-48.
General Principles and Specific Cases.Stephen Cohen - 1998 - Professional Ethics, a Multidisciplinary Journal 6 (3-4):5-18.
General Principles and Specific Cases.Stephen Cohen - 1998 - Professional Ethics, a Multidisciplinary Journal 6 (3-4):5-18.
When four principles are too many: a commentary.Raanan Gillon - 2012 - Journal of Medical Ethics 38 (4):197-198.
Global bioethics as modern medical ethics.Svitlana Pustovit & Liudmyla Paliei - 2012 - Ethics and Bioethics (in Central Europe) 2 (3-4):166-171.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-03-12

Downloads
223 (#94,251)

6 months
85 (#62,069)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Alan Tapper
Curtin University, Western Australia
Stephan John Millett
Curtin University, Western Australia

References found in this work

Autonomy and Trust in Bioethics.Onora O'Neill - 2002 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Are there any natural rights?H. L. A. Hart - 1955 - Philosophical Review 64 (2):175-191.
The virtues in medical practice.Edmund D. Pellegrino - 1993 - New York: Oxford University Press. Edited by David C. Thomasma.
Specifying norms as a way to resolve concrete ethical problems.Henry S. Richardson - 1990 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 19 (4):279-310.

View all 25 references / Add more references