Reid and Priestley on Method and the Mind

In John Haldane Stephen Read (ed.), The Philosophy of Thomas Reid. pp. 98-112 (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Reid said little in his published writings about his contemporary Joseph Priestley, but his unpublished work is largely devoted to the latter. Much of Priestley's philosophical thought- his materialism, his determinism, his Lockean scientific realism- was as antithetical to Reid's as was Hume's philosophy in a very different way. Neither Reid nor Priestley formulated a full response to the other. Priestley's response to Reid came very early in his career, and is marked by haste and immaturity. In his last decade Reid worried much about Priestley's materialism, but that concern never reached publication. I document Reid's unpublished response to Priestley, and also view Reid's response from Priestley's perspective, as deduced from his published works. Both thinkers attempted to base their arguments on Newtonian method. Reid's position is the more puzzling of the two, since he nowhere makes clear how Newtonian method favours mind-body dualism over materialism, which is the central debate between them

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,347

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Reid and Priestley on method and the mind.Alan Tapper - 2002 - Philosophical Quarterly 52 (209):511-525.
The Beginnings of Priestley's Materialism.Alan Tapper - 1982 - Enlightenment and Dissent 1 (1):73-81.
Point Atomism, Space and God, 1760–80.Karis Muller - 2007 - The European Legacy 12 (3):277-292.
Joseph Priestley.Alan Tapper - 2002 - In Philip B. Dematteis Peter S. Fosl (ed.), British Philosophers 1500–1799. Columbia, USA: Broccoli Clark Layman. pp. 307-23.
Priestley on Politics, Progress and Moral Theology.Alan Tapper - 1996 - In Knud Haakonssen (ed.), Enlightenment and Religion: Rational Dissent in Eighteenth-Century Britain. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. pp. 272-86.
Thomas Reid and non-euclidean geometry.Amit Hagar - 2002 - Reid Studies 5 (2):54-64.
Reid on consciousness: Hop, hot or for?Rebecca Copenhaver - 2007 - Philosophical Quarterly 57 (229):613-634.
Is Thomas Reid a mysterian?Rebecca Copenhaver - 2006 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 44 (3):449-466.
Political writings.Joseph Priestley - 1993 - New York: Cambridge University Press. Edited by Peter N. Miller.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-19

Downloads
50 (#320,327)

6 months
7 (#440,136)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Alan Tapper
Curtin University, Western Australia

Citations of this work

Priestley on materialism and the essence of God.Falk Wunderlich - 2020 - Intellectual History Review 30 (1):49-64.
Ideas, o movimientos en el cerebro.Sofía Calvente - 2023 - Contrastes: Revista Internacional de Filosofía 28 (2):9-28.
The Philosophy of Joseph Priestley's 1765 Timeline.Emily Thomas - 2023 - History of Philosophy Quarterly 40 (1):25-58.

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

The Beginnings of Priestley's Materialism.Alan Tapper - 1982 - Enlightenment and Dissent 1 (1):73-81.

Add more references